Name File Type Size Last Modified
MEET KII Interview Survey Results.xlsx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet 21.4 KB 06/12/2026 11:24:AM

Project Citation: 

Hua, Jenna. MEET Aim 1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2026-06-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E249902V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary This study aimed to understand the importance of culturally relevant education material in interventions to reduce endocrine disrupting chemical exposure (EDCs). In this qualitative study, we synthesized findings from key informant interviews which were informed by complimentary survey data measuring individual environmental health literacy, knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors to better understand the needs and perspectives of Black/African American communities regarding exposure to EDCs and related education. Between December 2024 and March 2025, interviews were conducted with 30 individuals (16 men and 14 women) and a survey was given prior to the interview. Twenty-eight participants consented to the use of their de-identified survey and interview data and were included in the analyses reported in this manuscript. The interview was grounded in the Health Belief Model[1], focusing on perceived severity of the health threat, cues to action, barriers to action, and self-efficacy. Data was analyzed using the Rapid Data Analysis approach and found 7 key themes, which were supported by the survey. Participants expressed concern about chemical exposures from the products they buy and a willingness to reduce their risk. They felt limited by costs, limited access to other options, the overwhelming presence of harmful chemicals in daily life, and simply not knowing what to do. The findings indicated that EDC education programs would be acceptable in the Black community.
Funding Sources:  View help for Funding Sources National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (1R43MD018950-01A1)

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms EDCs; Endocrine disrupting chemicals; Black community; Health disparities
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 12/2024 – 3/2025
Universe:  View help for Universe Members of the Black community.
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) survey data

Methodology

Response Rate:  View help for Response Rate Thirty-four percent of the 140 participants recruited agreed to complete an interview. Forty-nine participants completed the survey and 30 completed the interview. Twenty-eight individuals who completed both the survey and interview consented to the use of their de-identified data for research publication.
Sampling:  View help for Sampling Purposive convenience sampling methods were used to recruit a diverse range of participants by age, biological sex, education, and income level. Recruitment efforts were supported by the Bench to Community Initiative[34], community and academic organizations including the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity Tau Zeta Chapter, the Emerging 100 North Metro Atlanta Chapter of the 100 Black Men of America, Heritage Wellness Collective, and Emory University. Eligibility included being aged 18 and up, able to understand written and spoken English, owning a smartphone and willing to complete all study assessments.
Collection Mode(s):  View help for Collection Mode(s) face-to-face interview; web-based survey
Scales:  View help for Scales Several Likert type scales were used.

Related Publications

Request Information

This material is sensitive in nature and is available as restricted data through ICPSR. Users are required to apply for access, will be required to pay a fee, and will experience a wait time before access is given. The material will be distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR does not check or process the material.

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as received from the data depositor. As of April 2026, depositors are required to submit study materials in accessible formats. ICPSR has not reviewed, checked, or processed this material. For additional information about the study, please contact the investigator(s) directly. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR's Accessibility Center.