Name File Type Size Last Modified
Interview_raw data.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 50.7 KB 04/01/2026 11:22:PM

Project Citation: 

Xie, Jun. From Noticing to Reflection: A Qualitative Exploration of Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Effects on Electrocardiographic Monitoring Judgment in Critical Cardiac Care Nurses. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2026-04-02. https://doi.org/10.3886/E247281V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary This qualitative phenomenological study explored how Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice (RCDP), structured around Tanner’s Clinical Judgment Model, influenced electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring judgment among 13 critical cardiac care nurses in a tertiary Chinese hospital. Semi-structured interviews and field observations revealed four interconnected themes: a shift from fragmented data perception to holistic pattern recognition (noticing); a transition from mechanical rule‑based matching to integrated intuition‑evidence reasoning (interpreting); a move from hesitant reactivity to confident proactive responses (responding); and a redefined professional role encompassing new identity, ethical responsibility, and continuous learning (reflecting). The psychologically safe “pause‑coach‑resume” mechanism of RCDP appeared central to enabling these perceived transformations. Findings suggest that competency development in ECG interpretation requires educational strategies that simultaneously address cognitive, behavioral, and identity dimensions, with implications for staff training and future longitudinal research.



Related Publications

Request Information

This material is sensitive in nature and is available as restricted data through ICPSR. Users are required to apply for access, will be required to pay a fee, and will experience a wait time before access is given. The material will be distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR does not check or process the material.

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as received from the data depositor. As of April 2026, depositors are required to submit study materials in accessible formats. ICPSR has not reviewed, checked, or processed this material. For additional information about the study, please contact the investigator(s) directly. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR's Accessibility Center.