Name File Type Size Last Modified
CNH_1417_survey.xlsx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet 1.8 MB 07/30/2025 07:46:PM
CNH_2017_distance.xlsx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet 99.1 KB 07/30/2025 07:50:PM
CNH_2017_survey.xlsx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet 2.6 MB 07/30/2025 07:46:PM

Project Citation: 

Cao, Ren. Effects of Concurrent Conservation Initiatives on Forest-Adjacent Communities in the Chitwan Valley, Nepal. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2025-07-30. https://doi.org/10.3886/E236987V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Forest-adjacent communities in Nepal depend on livestock fodder and firewood for their livelihoods. This study examines how overlapping conservation efforts—namely, Community Forestry (CF) and silvicultural practices promoted under Scientific Forest Management (SFM)—have shaped household access to these resources. Using spatial mapping, forest committee surveys, and household data from over 1,200 respondents in 2014 and 1,400 in 2017, including a longitudinal analysis of over 600 matched households, we assess changes in travel distance to collect fodder and firewood across time and social groups. Our models reveal a shift in key predictors: under CF alone, household factors such as caste and land size were most associated with travel distance. Following the spread of SFM-inspired practices, forest management activities became stronger predictors. While these interventions appeared to improve fodder access, firewood collection distance increased significantly among marginalized groups, including Dalit, Terai Janajati, and female-headed households. This divergence highlights how concurrent conservation initiatives can produce unequal livelihood outcomes. Our findings underscore the need for integrated forest governance that addresses these social equity trade-offs, and they point toward a critical need for future research using mixed-methods and quasi-experimental designs to untangle the causal pathways of these complex policy interactions.

Scope of Project

Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage Nepal
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 3/1/2014 – 12/31/2017
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) geographic information system (GIS) data; survey data


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as received from the data depositor. As of April 2026, depositors are required to submit study materials in accessible formats. ICPSR has not reviewed, checked, or processed this material. For additional information about the study, please contact the investigator(s) directly. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR's Accessibility Center.