A newer version of this project is available. See below for other available versions.

ECIN Replication package for "Gender Differences in Cooperation in the U.S. Congress? Replicating Gagliarducci and Paserman (2022)""

Name: ECIN Replication package for "Gender Differences in Cooperation in the U.S. Congress? Replicating Gagliarducci and Paserman (2022)""
Published: 2025-03-11
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) MANUEL BAGUES, UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK; PAMELA CAMPA, STOCKHOLM INSTITUTE OF TRANSITION ECONOMICS; GIULIAN ETINGIN-FRATI, UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH

Version: View help for Version V3

Name	File Type	Size	Last Modified
EI - ICSPR Data Archive			08/06/2025 07:46:AM

Project Citation:

BAGUES, MANUEL, CAMPA, PAMELA, and ETINGIN-FRATI, GIULIAN. ECIN Replication package for “Gender Differences in Cooperation in the U.S. Congress? Replicating Gagliarducci and Paserman (2022)”". Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2025-08-07. https://doi.org/10.3886/E222321V3

Project Description

Summary:

Gagliarducci and Paserman (2022) study gender differences in cooperative behavior

among politicians using information from the U.S. House of Representatives between 1988 and 2010 on (i) the number of co-sponsors on bills and (ii) the share of co-sponsors from the rival party. Through different empirical strategies, they show that women-sponsored bills tend to have more co-sponsors, but the gap is only statistically significant among Republicans. Moreover, Republican women recruit a significantly larger share of co-sponsors from the rival party than Republican men, whereas the opposite is true among Democrats. GP argue that the observed pattern is consistent with a commonality of interest driving cooperation, rather than gender per se, since during this period Republican women were ideologically closer to the rival party than their male colleagues, while female Democrats were further away.

We examine the robustness of these findings to (i) the correction of some errors in two

control variables of the dataset used by GP and (ii) clustering the standard errors at the

individual level, instead of individual-term. These changes have a relatively minor impact on results: most coefficients are still statistically significant and the main conclusions from the analysis are confirmed. Furthermore, we extend the analysis to the 2011-2020 period. The analysis of gender differences in bipartisan cooperation confirms GP’s hypothesis that ideological distance plays an important role. However, results are slightly different when we analyze overall cooperation. The gender gap in favor of women is larger in magnitude than in GP and it is statistically significant in several specifications, providing support for the hypothesis that gender also matters for cooperation.

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:
D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
D90 Micro-Based Behavioral Economics: General

Manuscript Number: ECIN-Jan-2024-0023.R1

Related Publications

Download this project

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Dublin Core

DDI 2.5

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.