Name File Type Size Last Modified
Clean data.do text/plain 11.5 KB 03/28/2022 11:29:AM
Readme.txt text/plain 1.1 KB 03/28/2022 11:39:AM
Run analysis.do text/plain 24.8 KB 03/28/2022 11:33:AM
Shiftingnorms_Qualtrics_1.csv text/csv 472 KB 03/28/2022 11:39:AM
Shiftingnorms_Qualtrics_2.csv text/csv 129.7 KB 03/28/2022 11:29:AM
shiftingnorms_data.dta application/x-stata-dta 54.2 KB 03/28/2022 11:33:AM

Project Citation: 

Behnk, Sascha, Hao, Li, and Reuben, Ernesto. Replication data for: Shifting normative beliefs: On why groups behave more antisocially than individuals. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2022-03-28. https://doi.org/10.3886/E166122V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary A growing body of research shows that people tend to act more antisocially in groups than alone. However, little is known about why having "partners in crime" has such an effect. We run an experiment using sender-receiver games in which we elicit subjects' normative and empirical beliefs to shed light on potential driving factors of this phenomenon. We find that the involvement of an additional sender makes the antisocial actions of senders more normatively acceptable to all parties, including receivers. By contrast, empirical beliefs are unaffected by the additional sender, suggesting that antisocial behavior increases in groups because antisocial actions become more acceptable and not because acceptable behavior is expected less often. We identify a necessary condition for this effect: the additional sender has to actively participate in the decision-making.
Funding Sources:  View help for Funding Sources Tamkeen \ NYU Abu Dhabi Research Institute (Award CG005)



Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.