Data and Code for: Self-Persuasion: Evidence from Field Experimentsat International Debating Competitions
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Egon Tripodi, University of Essex; Peter Schwardmann, Carnegie Mellon University; Joel van der Weele, University of Amsterdam
Version: View help for Version V1
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
| replication_package | 11/10/2021 11:08:AM |
Project Citation:
Project Description
Abstract
Laboratory evidence shows that when people have to argue for a given position, they persuade themselves about the position’s factual and moral superiority. Such self-persuasion limits the po- tential of communication to resolve conflict and reduce polarization. We test for this phenomenon in a field setting, at international debating competitions that randomly assign experienced and mo- tivated debaters to argue one side of a topical motion. We find self-persuasion in factual beliefs and confidence in one’s position. Effect sizes are smaller than in the laboratory, but robust to a one-hour exchange of arguments and a ten-fold increase in incentives for accuracy.
Scope of Project
C93 Field Experiments
D83 Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
D91 Micro-Based Behavioral Economics: Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
Methodology
Related Publications
Published Versions
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as received from the data depositor. As of April 2026, depositors are required to submit study materials in accessible formats. ICPSR has not reviewed, checked, or processed this material. For additional information about the study, please contact the investigator(s) directly. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR's Accessibility Center.