Anticipated Future Political Participation: A College Student Sample

Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Dena Pastor, James Madison University; Chris Patterson, James Madison University; Abraham Goldberg, James Madison University

Version: View help for Version V1

Civic Learning, Engagement, and Action Data Sharing (CivicLEADS)

Name	File Type	Size	Last Modified
codebook.pdf	application/pdf	154.8 KB	01/29/2021 07:04:AM
frequencies of variables in pastoretal.pdf	application/pdf	138.8 KB	01/29/2021 07:04:AM
pastoretal.sas7bdat	application/x-sas-data	448 KB	01/29/2021 07:04:AM
survey.pdf	application/pdf	218.2 KB	01/29/2021 07:05:AM

Project Citation:

Pastor, Dena, Patterson, Chris, and Goldberg, Abraham. Anticipated Future Political Participation: A College Student Sample. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2021-03-08. https://doi.org/10.3886/E134261V1

Project Description

Summary: Data include responses from college students at a single university to sixteen items on the anticipated future engagement section of the Political Engagement Project Survey (PEPS; Beaumont, Colby, Ehrlich, and Torney-Purta, 2006), a survey used for the assessment of political engagement programs in higher education. Data were collected for institutional accountability purposes during required university-wide Assessment Days and used by researchers in a subsequent study to group college students into four classes based on their expected type of future civic and political engagement. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to categorize students into groups and class differences in gender, race, political ideology, and political knowledge were examined to acquire validity evidence for the 4-class solution,

The sample consists of 708 college students at James Madison University, a public, master’s level institution in the mid-Atlantic with about 20,000 undergraduate and 2,000 graduate students. The 708 college students in the sample completed the PEPS during one of three university-wide Assessment Days (Pastor et al., 2019). All undergraduates at the university are required to attend Assessment Day twice: once as entering first-years and again when they have amassed 45 to 70 credit hours. Data from Assessment Days were combined to create the sample, with 22%, 52%, and 25% of the 708 students being tested in the Fall 2017, Spring 2018, and Spring 2019 administrations, respectively. The distribution of gender and race in the sample aligns with the overall distribution at the university, with 59% of the sample identifying as females and 75% identifying as White. The sample was comprised of freshman (21%), sophomores (58%), and juniors (21%), but no seniors.

The data file contains:1) the responses to each item (both on the original 1 to 6 Likert scale and in two different dichotomized forms), 2) the latent class assignment from the researchers' 4-class model (using modal assignment), 3) gender (as both a numerical and character variable), ethnicity, scores on two separate measures of political knowledge and political ideology.

References:
Beaumont, Elizabeth, Anne Colby, Thomas Ehrlich, and Judith Torney-Purta. 2006. “Promoting Political Competence and Engagement in College Students: An Empirical Study.” Journal of Political Science Education 2(3): 249-70. doi: 10.1080/15512160600840467.

Pastor, Dena A., Kelly J. Foelber, Jessica N. Jacovidis, Keston H. Fulcher, Derek C. Sauder, and Paula D. Love. 2019. “University-Wide Assessment Days: The James Madison University Model.” The AIR Professional File Spring 2019: 1-13.

Scope of Project

Subject Terms: college students

Geographic Coverage: Harrisonburg, VA

Time Period(s): 8/2017 – 2/2019 (Fall 2017, Spring 2018, and Spring 2019)

Collection Date(s): 8/2017 – 2/2019 (Fall 2017, Spring 2018, Spring 2019)

Universe: College students at James Madison University, a public, master’s level institution in the mid-Atlantic with about 20,000 undergraduate and 2,000 graduate students.

Data Type(s): survey data

Methodology

Response Rate: Not applicable

Sampling: Data were collected during one of three university-wide Assessment Days (Pastor et al., 2019). All undergraduates at the university are required to attend Assessment Day twice: once as entering first-years (Fall Assessment Day) and again when they have amassed 45 to 70 credit hours (Spring Assessment Day). Data from Assessment Days were combined to create the sample, with 22%, 52%, and 25% of the 708 students being tested in the Fall 2017, Spring 2018, and Spring 2019 administrations, respectively.

Pastor, Dena A., Kelly J. Foelber, Jessica N. Jacovidis, Keston H. Fulcher, Derek C. Sauder, and Paula D. Love. 2019. “University-Wide Assessment Days: The James Madison University Model.” The AIR Professional File Spring 2019: 1-13.

Collection Mode(s): on-site questionnaire

Scales: The data file contains responses ro items/subscales on the Political Engagement Project Survey, specifically:

a subset of Anticipated Future Engagement Items
foundational knowledge subscale
political ideology item

The data file also contains a civics quiz score, which was calculated as the sum of 10 multiple-choice items. Five of the items were recommended by Delli Carpini and Keeter (1996) for use on a short political knowledge test. The remaining five items were used as a short measure of political knowledge by Owen, Soule, and Chariff (2011). Minor modifications were made to the items by the researchers.

Weights: none

Unit(s) of Observation: individuals

Geographic Unit: Not applicable

Related Publications

Download this project

Published Versions

V1 [2021-03-08]

Export Metadata

Dublin Core

DDI 2.5

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as received from the data depositor. As of April 2026, depositors are required to submit study materials in accessible formats. ICPSR has not reviewed, checked, or processed this material. For additional information about the study, please contact the investigator(s) directly. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR's Accessibility Center.