A newer version of this project is available. See below for other available versions.

Data and Code for: "Estimating Judicial Ideology"

Principal Investigator(s):  View help for Principal Investigator(s) Maya Sen, Harvard University; Adam Bonica, Stanford University

Version:  View help for Version V1

Name File Type Size Last Modified
JEP_figure1_mq_court_2019.csv text/csv 11.1 KB 02/11/2021 02:06:PM
JEP_figure1_mq_party.csv text/csv 602 bytes 11/12/2020 02:03:PM
JEP_figure4_coa_trump_cases.csv text/csv 11.1 KB 12/18/2020 12:32:PM
README.txt text/plain 2.7 KB 02/12/2021 03:30:PM
fjc_jep.csv text/csv 219.9 KB 02/12/2021 03:15:PM
jep_figure_1.R text/x-r-syntax 1.9 KB 02/12/2021 02:47:PM
jep_figure_2.R text/x-r-syntax 4.8 KB 02/11/2021 02:06:PM
jep_figure_3.R text/x-r-syntax 2.9 KB 02/12/2021 02:48:PM
jep_figure_4.R text/x-r-syntax 699 bytes 12/18/2020 12:32:PM
quinn-mqscores-permission.pdf application/pdf 857 KB 02/03/2021 12:11:PM

Project Citation: 

Sen, Maya, and Bonica, Adam. Data and Code for: “Estimating Judicial Ideology.” Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2021. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2021-02-22. https://doi.org/10.3886/E128663V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Analysis of circuit court decisions on cases involving the Trump administration. Included as part of an overview of estimating judicial ideology.

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms Courts; Ideology; Political Polarization
JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior


Related Publications

Download this project

Published Versions

V2 [2022-12-07]

V1 [2021-02-22]

Export Metadata

Dublin Core

DDI 2.5

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.