Name File Type Size Last Modified
centra574.sav application/x-spss-sav 38.6 KB 12/10/2020 09:46:PM
centra870.sav application/x-spss-sav 73.1 KB 12/10/2020 09:39:PM

Project Citation: 

Vignery, Kristel. A methodology and theoretical taxonomy for centrality measures. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2020-12-11. https://doi.org/10.3886/E128601V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary In social network analysis several measures were developed to assess a nodes’ centrality in a graph. Among these measures, we find connectivity or degree-based measures, geodesic distance-based indices, geodesic path-based scores and centrality measures related to a node’s neighborhood. Most studies dedicated to student networks use degree, closeness and/or betweenness centralities, even if other measures might be valid candidates for representing and understanding these networks. We choose eighteen centrality measures and computed these measures on a student network. The data were collected at Saint-Louis University in Brussels (i.e., USL-B), Belgium, in October 2016 A total of 574 first-generation freshmen students (students registered in their first year of studies for the first time) completed a paper survey. They were asked about their friendship ties at university. Since the survey was not mandatory, students who did not participate could nevertheless be cited as ties. We imputed the friendship relations for those 296 missing actors. This imputation enabled us to compute centrality measures for the 574 respondents and also for each of the 870 students belonging to the augmented network, that is, the 574 respondents and the 296 missing actors to whom ties were imputed.


Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms students; social networks; centrality
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage belgium
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 10/1/2016 – 10/31/2016 (Fall 2016)
Collection Date(s):  View help for Collection Date(s) 10/1/2016 – 10/31/2016


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as received from the data depositor. As of April 2026, depositors are required to submit study materials in accessible formats. ICPSR has not reviewed, checked, or processed this material. For additional information about the study, please contact the investigator(s) directly. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR's Accessibility Center.