Name File Type Size Last Modified
  data 10/12/2019 07:20:AM
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 10/12/2019 03:20:AM

Project Citation: 

Qin, Bei, Strömberg, David, and Wu, Yanhui. Replication data for: Media Bias in China. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2018. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E113189V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary This paper examines whether and how market competition affected the political bias of government-owned newspapers in China from 1981 to 2011. We measure media bias based on coverage of government mouthpiece content (propaganda) relative to commercial content. We first find that a reform that forced newspaper exits (reduced competition) affected media bias by increasing product specialization, with some papers focusing on propaganda and others on commercial content. Second, lower-level governments produce less-biased content and launch commercial newspapers earlier, eroding higher-level governments' political goals. Third, bottom-up competition intensifies the politico-economic tradeoff, leading to product proliferation and less audience exposure to propaganda.

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
      L31 Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship
      L82 Entertainment; Media
      O14 Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
      O17 Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
      P26 Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies: Political Economy; Property Rights
      P31 Socialist Enterprises and Their Transitions


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.