Supporting Students Reading Complex Texts: Evidence for Motivational Scaffolding
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Dan Reynolds, Vanderbilt University
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document | 13.9 KB | 07/13/2019 02:19:AM |
|
text/x-stata-syntax | 4.1 KB | 07/13/2019 02:19:AM |
Project Citation:
Reynolds, Dan. Supporting Students Reading Complex Texts: Evidence for Motivational Scaffolding. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-07-13. https://doi.org/10.3886/E110761V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) require students to read grade-level text with “scaffolding as needed.” The current study examines the effectiveness of interactional scaffolding, which is responsive in-person support an expert provides to a novice reader in order to support the reader’s comprehension during reading instruction, for 213 young adolescents learning within a four-lesson small-group guided-reading intervention (N = 196 instructional sessions). The intervention taught students, many of whom were reading below grade level, to use comprehension strategies as they read CCSS-style complex texts. To support student reading, tutors were encouraged to choose from a set of interactional scaffolds to contingently respond to student needs as they arose. Multilevel regression indicated that motivational scaffolding—but not vocabulary, fluency, comprehension or peer scaffolding—predicted growth on standardized reading comprehension. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
reading comprehension;
scaffolding;
motivation
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.