A newer version of this project is available. See below for other available versions.
Feasibility and effectiveness of a workplace-adapted mindfulness-based programme to reduce stress in workers of a private sector logistics company: an exploratory mixed methods study
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Javier García-Campayo, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (IIS Aragón)
Version: View help for Version V7
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
application/x-spss-sav | 8.4 KB | 01/14/2020 11:13:PM |
Project Citation:
García-Campayo, Javier. Feasibility and effectiveness of a workplace-adapted mindfulness-based programme to reduce stress in workers of a private sector logistics company: an exploratory mixed methods study . Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2020-02-26. https://doi.org/10.3886/E108743V7
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
There is a high prevalenceof stress in the logistics sector owing to very demanding, fast-paced and unpredictable tasks. Mindfulness-based programmes may reduce stress but require considerable practice. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a shortened, workplace-adapted, mindfulness-based programme for the logistics sector (WA-MBP-LS) for the purpose of reducing stress.A non-blinded, non-randomized, two-arm, controlled trial was conducted. The WA-MBP-LS (n=32) consisted of 6weekly 90-minute mindfulness sessions. The control group (n=36) attended a psycho-educational seminar. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) were measured at pre-test, post-test and 6-month follow-up. Differences between groups were evaluated using mixed-effects models. Qualitative methods were used to analyse implementation issues. A 64.2% reduction was observed between initial volunteers and actual participants. Attrition at6-month follow-up was 45.6%. Participants attended a median of 5 sessions. Decreases in PSS favoured the WA-MBP-LS group at post-test and follow-up. FFMQ played a mediating role in PSS reductions. Barriers were disinterest, lack of programming, work overload and job unattended. Facilitators were curiosity, timing, company facilities and audio recordings.The WA-MBP-LS was feasible and effective to reduce stress, but more efforts to improve the practicalities of implementation would be desirable.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
Mindfulness;
feasibility;
stress;
workplace;
WA-MBP-LS;
logistics sector
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
Spain
Universe:
View help for Universe
People who were working in the central delegation of a Spanish transport
company in February 2018
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
clinical data
Methodology
Response Rate:
View help for Response Rate
The study was integrated into a voluntarily training course to reduce
stress that was offered by the human resources section to the 300 people who
were working in the central delegation of a Spanish transport company in
February 2018. A total of 190 workers agreed to participate in the study on the
condition of being able to choose the group in which they would participate; thus,
randomization was not viable.
From all of the volunteers who initially agreed to participate, a total of 122 workers did not complete the baseline assessment and were therefore excluded from the study. The participants were allowed to choose the group in which they wished to participate, with 32 of them included in the experimental group and 36 in the wait-list control group, for a total of 68 participants at baseline.
From all of the volunteers who initially agreed to participate, a total of 122 workers did not complete the baseline assessment and were therefore excluded from the study. The participants were allowed to choose the group in which they wished to participate, with 32 of them included in the experimental group and 36 in the wait-list control group, for a total of 68 participants at baseline.
Sampling:
View help for Sampling
Non-randomized, two-arm, waitlist-controlled feasibility trial.
Collection Mode(s):
View help for Collection Mode(s)
web-based survey
Scales:
View help for Scales
Psychological scales:
-Perceived Stress Scale (PSS): The scale is composed of 10 items asking about the frequency of thoughts and feelings experienced during the last month with a Likert-type scale with 5 response options, from 0 (‘never’) to 4 (‘very often’).
-Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS): It is a self-report questionnaire that is composed of 7 items that are ranked by a Likert-type scale from 1 (‘never’) to 5 (‘always’).
-Job Satisfaction Scale (JSS): It is a self-report questionnaire that was designed for exploring general occupational aspects of job satisfaction in the present study. It asks questions onfive topics: relationship with superiors, relationships with other workers, level of assigned responsibility, acknowledgement obtained for work welldone, and attention paid by the company to worker suggestions. The degree of satisfaction for each of these items is assessed using a Likert-type scale with 7 response options, from 1 (‘very unsatisfied’) to 7 (‘very satisfied’).
- Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ): Respondents indicate on a 5-point Likert-type scale the degree to which each item is true for them, from 1 (‘never true’) to 5 (‘always true’).
Socio-demographic variables: age, sex, relationship (yes, no), number of children, residence (urban, non-urban), level of education (primary, secondary, university), years of service, sick leave in the last year (yes, no), type of contract (temporary, permanent), income satisfaction (not satisfied, slightly satisfied, moderately satisfied, very satisfied), minutes of vigorous weekly physical activity, and mindfulness practice during the previous six months (yes, no).
-Perceived Stress Scale (PSS): The scale is composed of 10 items asking about the frequency of thoughts and feelings experienced during the last month with a Likert-type scale with 5 response options, from 0 (‘never’) to 4 (‘very often’).
-Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS): It is a self-report questionnaire that is composed of 7 items that are ranked by a Likert-type scale from 1 (‘never’) to 5 (‘always’).
-Job Satisfaction Scale (JSS): It is a self-report questionnaire that was designed for exploring general occupational aspects of job satisfaction in the present study. It asks questions onfive topics: relationship with superiors, relationships with other workers, level of assigned responsibility, acknowledgement obtained for work welldone, and attention paid by the company to worker suggestions. The degree of satisfaction for each of these items is assessed using a Likert-type scale with 7 response options, from 1 (‘very unsatisfied’) to 7 (‘very satisfied’).
- Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ): Respondents indicate on a 5-point Likert-type scale the degree to which each item is true for them, from 1 (‘never true’) to 5 (‘always true’).
Socio-demographic variables: age, sex, relationship (yes, no), number of children, residence (urban, non-urban), level of education (primary, secondary, university), years of service, sick leave in the last year (yes, no), type of contract (temporary, permanent), income satisfaction (not satisfied, slightly satisfied, moderately satisfied, very satisfied), minutes of vigorous weekly physical activity, and mindfulness practice during the previous six months (yes, no).
Unit(s) of Observation:
View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Individuals
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as received from the data depositor. As of April 2026, depositors are required to submit study materials in accessible formats. ICPSR has not reviewed, checked, or processed this material. For additional information about the study, please contact the investigator(s) directly. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR's Accessibility Center.