Name File Type Size Last Modified
2015-Spring-Opens-Redacted application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet 240.3 KB 04/19/2016 02:11:PM
s15-restricted application/x-spss-sav 547.6 KB 04/12/2016 05:13:PM
s15-restricted application/x-stata 963.2 KB 04/12/2016 05:13:PM
s15-restricted text/csv 660.1 KB 04/12/2016 05:13:PM
s15-restricted text/html 963.2 KB 04/12/2016 05:13:PM
s15-restricted text/plain 660.1 KB 04/12/2016 05:13:PM
s15-restricted_codebook.pdf application/pdf 580.3 KB 05/01/2017 08:47:AM

Login to generate citation for this folder.

To view the citation for the overall project, see http://doi.org/10.3886/E100148V11.

Folder Description

Summary:  View help for Summary The Spring 2015 MPPS was the thirteenth wave in the MPPS survey program. The primary focus of the survey was on fiscal, budgetary and operational policies. Additional questions focused on retiree health care and income benefits and job approval assessments for the governor, state legislators, and state agencies. This survey ran from April 6 to June 8, 2015 and received responses from 72% of jurisdictions. 

Scope of Folder

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms retirement plans; health insurance; governors; government revenue; government performance; government spending; budgets; pension plans; government services; state legislatures; state government
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage Michigan
Collection Date(s):  View help for Collection Date(s) 4/6/2015 – 6/8/2015 (Spring 2015)
Universe:  View help for Universe
3,712 top elected and top appointed officials from all 1,856 Michigan counties,
cities, villages, and townships
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) survey data

Methodology

Response Rate:  View help for Response Rate 72% by jurisdiction; 41% by individual respondent
Sampling:  View help for Sampling The sample for the Spring 2015 MPPS included on average two officials from each of the local general purpose units of government (83 counties, 279 cities, 254 villages, and 1,240 townships) in the state of Michigan. The sample frame included, where the position existed and was not vacant, the top elected and top appointed official in each jurisdiction. For counties, this consisted of county administrators and board chairs; for cities, mayors and city managers; for villages, village presidents and managers. Townships are a special case, in that, typically, their governing officials are all elected. Therefore, in townships, both the elected supervisors and the elected clerks were administered surveys, as well as the few appointed township managers.
Collection Mode(s):  View help for Collection Mode(s) mail questionnaire; web-based survey
Weights:  View help for Weights
The Spring 2015 dataset includes two separate weights—one for individual-level (ind_wgt) and
one for jurisdiction-level (juris_wgt) analyses—that should be used to account for nonresponse at
the individual and jurisdictional levels, respectively. The variable samp_juris can be used to
select cases according to whether analysis is being done at the individual-level or jurisdictionlevel.
Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation Jurisdiction, Individual

Related Publications

Request Information

This material is sensitive in nature and is available as restricted data through ICPSR. Users are required to apply for access, may be required to pay a fee, and there may be a wait time before access can be provided. The material will be distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR does not check or process the material.

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.