Michigan Public Policy Survey Restricted Use Datasets

Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy

Version Title: View help for Version Title Spring 2009 - Fall 2016

Name	File Type	Size	Last Modified
MPPS_2010_fall_data_OPENS-REDACTED.xlsx	application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet	373.6 KB	12/21/2016 10:22:AM
f10-restricted.csv	text/csv	606.9 KB	05/01/2017 07:36:AM
f10-restricted.dta	application/x-stata	798.8 KB	12/21/2016 10:22:AM
f10-restricted.sav	application/x-spss-sav	500.6 KB	12/21/2016 07:37:AM
f10_restricted_codebook.pdf	application/pdf	3.8 MB	05/01/2017 07:36:AM

To view the citation for the overall project, see http://doi.org/10.3886/E100148V11.

Folder Description

Summary: The Fall 2010 MPPS wave focused on intergovernmental cooperation, consolidation and service sharing. Additional questions focused on local governmental environmental leadership, energy efficiency, and global warming.

Scope of Folder

Subject Terms: environment; leadership; global warming; intergovernmental cooperation; consolidation; service sharing; local government; energy efficiency

Geographic Coverage: Michigan

Collection Date(s): 11/9/2010 – 12/22/2010 (Fall 2010)

Universe: 3,502 top elected and top appointed officials from all 1,856 Michigan counties, cities, villages, and townships

Data Type(s): survey data

Methodology

Response Rate: 63% by jurisdiction; 41% by individual respondent

Sampling: The sample for the Fall 2010 MPPS included on average two officials from each of the local general purpose units of government (83 counties, 277 cities, 256 villages, and 1,240 townships) in the state of Michigan. The sample frame included, where the position existed and was not vacant, the top elected and top appointed official in each jurisdiction. For counties, this consisted of county administrators and board chairs; for cities, mayors and city managers; for villages, village presidents and managers. Townships are a special case, in that, typically, their governing officials are all elected. Therefore, in townships, both the elected supervisors and the elected clerks were administered surveys, as well as the few appointed township managers.

Collection Mode(s): mail questionnaire; web-based survey

Weights: The Fall 2010 dataset includes two separate weights—one for individual-level and one for jurisdiction-level analyses— that should be used to account for nonresponse at the individual and jurisdictional levels.

Unit(s) of Observation: Jurisdiction, Individual

Related Publications

Request Information

This material is sensitive in nature and is available as restricted data through ICPSR. Users are required to apply for access, will be required to pay a fee, and will experience a wait time before access is given. The material will be distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR does not check or process the material.

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Dublin Core

DDI 2.5

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as received from the data depositor. As of April 2026, depositors are required to submit study materials in accessible formats. ICPSR has not reviewed, checked, or processed this material. For additional information about the study, please contact the investigator(s) directly. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR's Accessibility Center.