Name File Type Size Last Modified
AERA OPEN Public Use File 3.3.2025.do text/plain 11.1 KB 03/31/2025 05:44:PM
Comstocketal_LPA.R text/x-rsrc 4.3 KB 03/03/2025 10:13:AM
Data Access File.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 15.1 KB 03/03/2025 10:16:AM
ReadMe.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 15.3 KB 03/03/2025 05:38:AM
Survey Instrument.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 20 KB 03/03/2025 10:17:AM

Project Citation: 

Comstock, Meghan, Desimone, Laura M., Shores, Kenneth A., Polanco, Camila, Hill , Kirsten Lee, and Litke, Erica. Toward More Equitable Instruction: How Teachers Integrate Ambitious, Traditional, and Culturally Responsive Mathematics Practices. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2025-04-01. https://doi.org/10.3886/E224962V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Increasingly, there is consensus that equitable mathematics instruction incorporates ambitious and culturally responsive (CR) practices. Using self-reported survey data and mixture modeling, we examine teachers’ emphasis on ambitious, traditional, and CR mathematics practices. We offer an emergent typology for characterizing teacher engagement with CR teaching in mathematics. One-half of teachers—predominantly white, experienced—reported rarely engaging in CR practices, focusing exclusively on a mix of ambitious and traditional practices. One-third of teachers emphasized some CR practices alongside ambitious and traditional practices. Less than one-quarter of teachers—predominantly teachers of color—emphasized ambitious mathematics and a robust set of CR practices. Teachers who de-emphasize CR teaching report believing in it but having low self-efficacy. We offer implications for policy and practice.

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms mathematics education; culturally responsive teaching; equitable instruction; instructional reform; survey analysis


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.