Winners and Losers from Property Taxation
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Kasper Kragh Balke, University of Oslo; Markus Karlman, NHH Norwegian School of Economics; Karin Kinnerud, BI Norwegian Business School
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet | 17.1 KB | 03/17/2025 09:45:AM |
|
text/plain | 1.5 KB | 08/20/2020 04:17:AM |
|
text/plain | 32 KB | 03/14/2025 07:03:AM |
|
application/pdf | 513.6 KB | 01/19/2017 12:03:AM |
|
text/plain | 13.8 MB | 01/19/2017 12:02:AM |
|
text/plain | 112 KB | 01/19/2017 12:02:AM |
|
text/plain | 3.7 KB | 03/14/2025 07:03:AM |
|
text/plain | 11.2 KB | 03/17/2025 10:24:AM |
|
text/plain | 7.6 KB | 03/18/2025 07:04:AM |
|
text/plain | 4.1 KB | 03/17/2025 09:40:AM |
- Total of 12 records. Records per page
- « previous Page of 2
- next »
Project Citation:
Balke, Kasper Kragh, Karlman, Markus, and Kinnerud, Karin. Winners and Losers from Property Taxation. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2025-03-18. https://doi.org/10.3886/E223402V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
This paper considers optimal taxation of housing capital. To this end, we employ a life-cycle model calibrated to the U.S. economy, where asset holdings and labor productivity vary across households, and tax reforms lead to changes in house and rental prices, interest rates, and wages. We find that the optimal property tax in the long run is considerably higher than today, partly due to the relatively inelastic demand and supply of housing. A higher property tax also reduces house prices and causes a reallocation from housing to business capital, which in turn decreases interest rates and increases wages. These equilibrium effects allow for an improved consumption smoothing over the life cycle. However, most current households would incur substantial welfare losses from an implementation of a higher property tax, since house prices fall, and a majority own their home.Hence, when accounting for transitional dynamics, it is not clear that a higher property tax is feasible or preferred.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
PSID
Time Period(s):
View help for Time Period(s)
1970 – 1992
Collection Date(s):
View help for Collection Date(s)
1/19/2017 – 1/19/2017
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.