Supplementary Data for: Francine D. Blau and Lawrence M. Kahn, “The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations”, Journal of Economic Literature , 55 ,3 (Sept 2017): 789-865
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Lawrence Kahn, Cornell University; Francine Blau, Cornell University
Version: View help for Version V2
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
application/x-stata-dta | 30.6 MB | 11/07/2024 10:07:AM |
|
text/plain | 100 bytes | 11/13/2024 12:24:PM |
Project Citation:
Kahn, Lawrence, and Blau, Francine. Supplementary Data for: Francine D. Blau and Lawrence M. Kahn, “The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations”, Journal of Economic Literature , 55 ,3 (Sept 2017): 789-865. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2024-11-13. https://doi.org/10.3886/E210483V2
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Using PSID microdata over the 1980-2010, we provide new empirical evidence
on the extent of and trends in the gender wage gap, which declined considerably
over this period. By 2010, conventional
human capital variables taken together explained little of the gender wage gap,
while gender differences in occupation and industry continued to be
important. Moreover, the gender pay gap declined
much more slowly at the top of the wage distribution that at the middle or the
bottom and by 2010 was noticeably higher at the top. We then survey the literature to identify what
has been learned about the explanations for the gap. We conclude that many of the traditional
explanations continue to have salience. Although
human capital factors are now relatively unimportant in the aggregate, women’s work
force interruptions and shorter hours remain significant in high skilled
occupations, possibly due to compensating differentials. Gender differences in occupations and
industries, as well as differences in gender roles and the gender division of
labor remain important, and research based on experimental evidence strongly suggests
that discrimination cannot be discounted. Psychological attributes or noncognitive
skills comprise one of the newer explanations for gender differences in
outcomes. Our effort to assess the quantitative
evidence on the importance of these factors suggests that they account for a
small to moderate portion of the gender pay gap, considerably smaller than say
occupation and industry effects, though they appear to modestly contribute to
these differences.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
PSID
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
USA
Time Period(s):
View help for Time Period(s)
1980 – 2010 (1980, 1990, and 2010)
Collection Date(s):
View help for Collection Date(s)
1980 – 2010
Universe:
View help for Universe
PSID Family database
Methodology
Unit(s) of Observation:
View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Individual workers
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.