Name File Type Size Last Modified
  Code 12/18/2024 02:05:PM
  Data 11/04/2024 02:40:AM
  Figures 12/18/2024 02:06:PM
  Output 12/18/2024 02:08:PM
  Tables 12/18/2024 02:10:PM
README.pdf application/pdf 248.3 KB 12/19/2024 09:55:PM

Project Citation: 

Bobrov, Anton, Kamdar, Rupal, and Ulate, Mauricio. Data and Code for: Regional Dissent: Do Local Economic Conditions Influence FOMC Votes? Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2025. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2025-05-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E210141V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary U.S. monetary-policy decisions are made by the 12 voting members of the FOMC. Seven of these members inherently represent national-level interests. The remaining members, a rotating group of presidents from the 12 Federal Reserve districts, come instead from sub-national jurisdictions. Does this structure have implications for the monetary policy-making process? We provide novel evidence that regional economic conditions influence the voting behavior of district presidents. Specifically, a regional unemployment rate that is one-percentage-point higher than the national level is associated with an approximately nine-percentage-points higher probability of dissenting in favor of looser policy at the FOMC.

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms Monetary Policy; FOMC; Regional Economic Conditions; Taylor Rule
JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      E32 Business Fluctuations; Cycles
      E52 Monetary Policy
      E58 Central Banks and Their Policies
      E61 Policy Objectives; Policy Designs and Consistency; Policy Coordination
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage United States of America
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 1/1/1990 – 12/31/2017


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.