Measuring the Interdisciplinarity and Collaboration Perceptions of U.S. Scientists, Engineers, and Educators
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Katherine R. McCance, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Margaret R. Blanchard, North Carolina State University
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
application/x-spss-sav | 17.9 KB | 11/09/2023 01:09:PM |
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document | 12.5 KB | 11/09/2023 01:01:PM |
Project Citation:
McCance, Katherine R., and Blanchard, Margaret R. Measuring the Interdisciplinarity and Collaboration Perceptions of U.S. Scientists, Engineers, and Educators. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2023-11-09. https://doi.org/10.3886/E195046V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
These files contain the anonymized data used to create the results found in "Measuring the Interdisciplinarity and Collaboration Perceptions of U.S.
Scientists, Engineers, and Educators."
Abstract:
Interdisciplinarity has the potential to lead to more innovation and advances in knowledge than are possible from a single discipline. Yet, little is known about interdisciplinary collaborations and the perceptions of those involved. This quantitative study investigated the perceptions of U.S. faculty, staff, postdocs, and graduate students involved in Education and Science/Engineering collaborations. Exploratory Factor Analysis was conducted for two modified scales, Collaboration Perceptions (CP; n = 117; 17 items; 𝛼 = .923) and Interdisciplinarity Perceptions (IP; n = 119; 11 items; 𝛼 = .852). Participants’ perceptions of collaboration and interdisciplinarity were strongly positive and did not significantly differ based on demographic factors (e.g., gender, discipline, role). Perceptions were influenced by Collectivist orientation; the High Collectivism group had significantly more positive perceptions of collaboration and interdisciplinarity, and Collectivist orientation was positively and significantly correlated with CP and IP scores. Implications and recommendations for interdisciplinary collaborations will be discussed.
Abstract:
Interdisciplinarity has the potential to lead to more innovation and advances in knowledge than are possible from a single discipline. Yet, little is known about interdisciplinary collaborations and the perceptions of those involved. This quantitative study investigated the perceptions of U.S. faculty, staff, postdocs, and graduate students involved in Education and Science/Engineering collaborations. Exploratory Factor Analysis was conducted for two modified scales, Collaboration Perceptions (CP; n = 117; 17 items; 𝛼 = .923) and Interdisciplinarity Perceptions (IP; n = 119; 11 items; 𝛼 = .852). Participants’ perceptions of collaboration and interdisciplinarity were strongly positive and did not significantly differ based on demographic factors (e.g., gender, discipline, role). Perceptions were influenced by Collectivist orientation; the High Collectivism group had significantly more positive perceptions of collaboration and interdisciplinarity, and Collectivist orientation was positively and significantly correlated with CP and IP scores. Implications and recommendations for interdisciplinary collaborations will be discussed.
Funding Sources:
View help for Funding Sources
USDA (2017-67009-26771)
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.