Stock Market Liberalization, Agency Shock, and Dividend Policy
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Mingqin Chen, Shantou University; Shantou University
Version: View help for Version V1
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data & codes | 07/22/2023 12:27:AM | ||
|
|
application/zip | 2.3 MB | 06/21/2023 07:55:PM |
Project Citation:
Chen, Mingqin, and Shantou University. Stock Market Liberalization, Agency Shock, and Dividend Policy. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2023-07-22. https://doi.org/10.3886/E192874V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
This study examines changes in firms’ dividend payouts following an agency shock to managers and investors in the Chinese context. The conceptual differences proposed by Kalay (2014) suggest that an agency (information) shock predicts a decrease (increase) in dividend payments. We test this prediction by analyzing the dividend payment behaviors of eligible firms under the Shanghai-Hong Kong Connect (SHK Connect) around the Chinese capital market liberalization. The event serves as a proxy for a general improvement of the agency cost environment in the economy. Using a Difference-in-differences model under Propensity score matching methodology (PSM-DID), we find that both the dividend levels and the number of dividend-payers decline after the event, and firms are less (more) likely to increase (decrease) dividends. Such changes occur around the agency shock. The downward patterns occur in firms with no pre-event foreign shareholdings and are more pronounced in stocks with the most active foreign trading. We further show that the declining trend only appears in firms that are more subject to agency problems. Our results confirm the essential monitoring role of foreign investors in shaping firms’ dividend policies.
Funding Sources:
View help for Funding Sources
Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong, China (2019A1515011591)
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.