Data and Code for Hidden Income and the Perceived Returns to Migration
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Travis Baseler, University of Rochester
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
dofiles | 02/16/2023 08:53:AM | ||
figs | 07/25/2022 11:33:AM | ||
master | 07/25/2022 11:33:AM | ||
raw | 07/25/2022 11:35:AM | ||
surveys | 07/25/2022 11:36:AM | ||
tables | 07/25/2022 11:33:AM | ||
temp | 07/25/2022 11:33:AM | ||
|
text/plain | 15.2 KB | 07/25/2022 07:33:AM |
|
application/pdf | 198.3 KB | 02/16/2023 03:43:AM |
Project Citation:
Baseler, Travis. Data and Code for Hidden Income and the Perceived Returns to Migration. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2023. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2023-09-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E176081V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
This deposit includes code and data to reproduce the findings of this paper. Paper abstract below.
Abstract: In many developing economies, urban workers earn substantially more than rural workers with the same level of education. Why don't more rural workers migrate to cities? I use two field experiments in Kenya to show that low migration is partly due to underestimation of urban incomes, which is sustained by income hiding by migrants. Parents at the origin underestimate their migrant children's incomes by nearly half, and underestimation is greater when a migrant's remittance obligations are high. Providing information about urban earnings increases migration to the capital city by about 40% over two years.
Abstract: In many developing economies, urban workers earn substantially more than rural workers with the same level of education. Why don't more rural workers migrate to cities? I use two field experiments in Kenya to show that low migration is partly due to underestimation of urban incomes, which is sustained by income hiding by migrants. Parents at the origin underestimate their migrant children's incomes by nearly half, and underestimation is greater when a migrant's remittance obligations are high. Providing information about urban earnings increases migration to the capital city by about 40% over two years.
Funding Sources:
View help for Funding Sources
Weiss Family Fund;
Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research;
Stanford Center on Global Poverty and Development;
Stanford School of Humanities and Sciences;
Freeman Spogli Institute
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
migration;
hidden income;
urban-rural income gap
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
D82 Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
D83 Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
D84 Expectations; Speculations
J61 Geographic Labor Mobility; Immigrant Workers
O15 Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
R12 Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity
R23 Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics: Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population; Neighborhood Characteristics
D82 Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
D83 Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
D84 Expectations; Speculations
J61 Geographic Labor Mobility; Immigrant Workers
O15 Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
R12 Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity
R23 Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics: Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population; Neighborhood Characteristics
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
Kenya
Time Period(s):
View help for Time Period(s)
5/25/2016 – 5/10/2019
Collection Date(s):
View help for Collection Date(s)
5/25/2016 – 5/10/2019
Universe:
View help for Universe
Rural households in western Kenya with at least one person aged 18-35 living at home.
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
experimental data;
program source code;
survey data
Methodology
Response Rate:
View help for Response Rate
497 households participated in the ULM (Urban Labor Market) experiment. 460 of those households participated in a 1-year follow-up survey, and 436 participated in a 2-year follow-up survey. 4,994 households participated in the MR (Migrant Remittances) experiment.
Sampling:
View help for Sampling
Households in the ULM experiment were selected systematically by local survey staff. Households in the MR experiment were selected from an independent sample of rural households in western Kenya, excluding households that currently had a migrant living in Nairobi.
Data Source:
View help for Data Source
Surveys conducted by the author.
Collection Mode(s):
View help for Collection Mode(s)
face-to-face interview;
telephone interview
Weights:
View help for Weights
None.
Unit(s) of Observation:
View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Family, Household, Individual
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.