Data and Code for: "Taxing Billionaires: Estate Taxes and the Geographical Location of the Ultra-Wealthy"
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Enrico Moretti, University of California-Berkeley; Daniel Wilson, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Version: View help for Version V1
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
| ReplicationPackage | 12/20/2022 07:01:PM | ||
|
|
application/pdf | 286.1 KB | 03/13/2023 01:59:PM |
Project Citation:
Moretti, Enrico, and Wilson, Daniel. Data and Code for: “Taxing Billionaires: Estate Taxes and the Geographical Location of the Ultra-Wealthy.” Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2023. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2023-04-07. https://doi.org/10.3886/E157481V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
We study the effect of state-level estate taxes on the geographical location of the Forbes 400 richest Americans and its implications for tax policy. We use a change in federal law to identify the tax sensitivity of the ultra-wealthy's locational choices.
Before 2001, estate tax liabilities for the ultra-wealthy were independent of where they live due to a federal credit against state estate taxes. In 2001, the credit was eliminated and their estate tax liabilities suddenly became highly dependent on where they live.
We find the number of Forbes 400 individuals in estate tax states fell by 35% after 2001 compared to non-estate tax states. We also find that billionaires' sensitivity to the estate tax increases significantly with age.
Overall, billionaires’ geographical location appears to be highly sensitive to estate taxes. When we estimate the effect of billionaire deaths on state tax revenues, we find a sharp increase in revenues in the three years after a Forbes billionaire's death, totaling $165 million for the average billionaire.
In the last part of the paper, we estimate the revenue costs and benefits for each state of having an estate tax.
The benefit is the tax revenue gain when a wealthy resident dies, while the cost is the forgone income tax revenues over the remaining lifetimes of those who relocate.
Surprisingly, despite the high estimated tax mobility, we find that the benefit exceeds the cost for the vast majority of states.
Of the states that currently do not have an estate tax, all but California would experience revenue gains if they were to adopt one.
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
H20 Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General
H30 Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents: General
H20 Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General
H30 Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents: General
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.