LA River STEW-MAP
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Alyssa Thomas, USDA Forest Service
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document | 31.3 KB | 09/02/2021 03:51:PM |
|
text/csv | 58.6 KB | 09/02/2021 02:55:PM |
Project Citation:
Thomas, Alyssa. LA River STEW-MAP. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2021-09-02. https://doi.org/10.3886/E149161V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
In recent years environmental
stewardship has been emphasized as one solution to social-ecological
sustainability concerns, especially at the local scale. The Stewardship Mapping
and Assessment Project (STEW-MAP) is a national research program developed by
the USDA Forest Service that has been implemented at numerous locations in the
United States and internationally, including the Los Angeles River watershed. Through
an online survey of stewardship groups, the LA River STEW-MAP aims to provide better
and more detailed information on the organizational characteristics,
geographical footprint, and collaborative relationships of groups working on
environmental stewardship in the Los Angeles River watershed.
Specifically, this study compared the mission statements of the responding groups to previously proposed definitions and frameworks of organizational environmental stewardship to see how well they were reflected. A thematic analysis of the mission statements was also carried out to identify locally important themes and priorities. Results show that, although often consistent, the mission statements do not always reflect existing concepts around environmental stewardship. Additionally, stewardship is not always explicit in the mission statements of organizations that are known to conduct these activities. We suggest that non-traditional groups that engage in stewardship work (e.g., research institutions) are an overlooked actor in sustainable city goals.
Specifically, this study compared the mission statements of the responding groups to previously proposed definitions and frameworks of organizational environmental stewardship to see how well they were reflected. A thematic analysis of the mission statements was also carried out to identify locally important themes and priorities. Results show that, although often consistent, the mission statements do not always reflect existing concepts around environmental stewardship. Additionally, stewardship is not always explicit in the mission statements of organizations that are known to conduct these activities. We suggest that non-traditional groups that engage in stewardship work (e.g., research institutions) are an overlooked actor in sustainable city goals.
Funding Sources:
View help for Funding Sources
USDA Forest Service
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
steward;
environment;
socio-ecological
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
Los Angeles River Watershed
Collection Date(s):
View help for Collection Date(s)
6/17/2019 – 10/31/2019
Universe:
View help for Universe
Organizations involved in stewardship work in the Los Angeles River Watershed
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
survey data
Methodology
Response Rate:
View help for Response Rate
18%
Sampling:
View help for Sampling
The LA River STEW-MAP sampling frame used an existing LA County STEW-MAP
dataset as a starting point for identifying organizations within the LA River watershed
engaged in stewardship work. In addition, key stewardship groups within the
watershed were identified by the planning team, and then approached by (removed
for blind review) with a request for their list of relevant organizational
partners and potential data providers in the geographic area. The organizations
on those two lists were further investigated by (removed for blind review) through
internet research (e.g. dedicated webpages on partners, mentions of project
partners) to find additional partners of the responding organizations.
Collection Mode(s):
View help for Collection Mode(s)
telephone interview;
web-based survey
Scales:
View help for Scales
A Likert-type scale was used
Unit(s) of Observation:
View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Organization
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.