Data and Code for: Radical and Incremental Innovation: The Roles of Firms, Managers, and Innovators
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Daron Acemoglu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Ufuk Akcigit, University of Chicago; Murat Alp Celik, University of Toronto
Version: View help for Version V1
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortran simulation code | 11/07/2020 09:07:PM | ||
| figures | 11/07/2020 09:03:PM | ||
| in text numbers | 11/07/2020 09:03:PM | ||
| tables | 11/07/2020 09:03:PM | ||
| unweighted | 05/26/2021 12:19:AM | ||
| weighted | 05/26/2021 12:18:AM | ||
|
|
application/x-dosexec | 11.6 MB | 11/07/2020 04:03:PM |
|
|
text/x-matlab | 941 bytes | 11/07/2020 04:03:PM |
|
|
text/x-matlab | 555 bytes | 11/07/2020 04:03:PM |
|
|
text/x-matlab | 5.4 KB | 11/07/2020 04:03:PM |
- Total of 17 records. Records per page
- « previous Page of 2
- next »
Project Description
Abstract: This paper investigates the determinants of radical (“creative”) innovations – innovations that break new ground in terms of knowledge creation. After presenting a motivating model focusing on the choice between incremental and radical innovation, and on how managers of different ages and human capital are sorted across different types of firms, we provide firm-level and patent-level evidence that firms that are more open to hiring younger managers (those that are more “open to disruption”) are significantly more likely to engage in radical innovation. Our measures of radical innovations proxy for innovation quality (average number of citations per patent) and creativity (fraction of superstar innovators, the likelihood of a very high number of citations, and generality of patents). We present robust evidence that firms that have a comparative advantage in new innovations (e.g., because they are more open to disruption) generate more creative innovations, but we also show that once the effect of the sorting of young managers to such firms is factored in, the (causal) impact of manager age on creative innovations, though positive, is small.
Scope of Project
O33 Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
O40 Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity: General
O43 Institutions and Growth
P10 Capitalist Systems: General
P16 Capitalist Systems: Political Economy
Z10 Cultural Economics; Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology: General
Related Publications
Published Versions
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as received from the data depositor. As of April 2026, depositors are required to submit study materials in accessible formats. ICPSR has not reviewed, checked, or processed this material. For additional information about the study, please contact the investigator(s) directly. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR's Accessibility Center.