Name File Type Size Last Modified
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 12/06/2019 10:44:AM
aerdata.dta application/octet-stream 85.4 KB 12/06/2019 10:44:AM
createregressions.do text/plain 8.5 KB 12/06/2019 10:44:AM
readme.txt text/plain 376 bytes 12/06/2019 10:44:AM

Project Citation: 

Mobius, Markus M., and Rosenblat, Tanya S. Replication data for: Why Beauty Matters. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2006. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-12-06. https://doi.org/10.3886/E116076V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary We decompose the beauty premium in an experimental labor market where "employers" determine wages of "workers" who perform a maze-solving task. This task requires a true skill which we show to be unaffected by physical attractiveness. We find a sizable beauty premium and can identify three transmission channels: (a) physically attractive workers are more confident and higher confidence increases wages; (b) for a given level of confidence, physically attractive workers are (wrongly) considered more able by employers; (c) controlling for worker confidence, physically attractive workers have oral skills (such as communication and social skills) that raise their wages when they interact with employers. Our methodology can be adopted to study the sources of discriminatory pay differentials in other settings.

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      J24 Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
      J31 Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
      J71 Labor Discrimination
      M52 Personnel Economics: Compensation and Compensation Methods and Their Effects
      O15 Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.