Replication data for: Measuring Welfare with Massive Online Choice Experiments: A Brief Introduction
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Erik Brynjolfsson; Felix Eggers; Avinash Gannamaneni
Version: View help for Version V1
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data-and-Code | 10/13/2019 12:01:AM | ||
|
|
text/plain | 14.6 KB | 10/12/2019 08:01:PM |
Project Citation:
Brynjolfsson, Erik, Eggers, Felix, and Gannamaneni, Avinash. Replication data for: Measuring Welfare with Massive Online Choice Experiments: A Brief Introduction. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2018. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-13. https://doi.org/10.3886/E114444V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
GDP is a measure of production, and yet it is widely used as a proxy for well-being. It is particularly ill-suited for assessing the contributions of digital goods which are free to consumers and thus excluded from GDP measures. This underscores the need to develop new measures of well-being which can assess not only the contributions of digital goods but also welfare more generally. In Brynjolfsson, Eggers, and Gannamaneni (2017), we propose a new way of measuring consumer welfare using massive online choice experiments. This brief paper motivates the need for such an approach and introduces the method.
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
C90 Design of Experiments: General
E01 Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth; Environmental Accounts
E23 Macroeconomics: Production
C90 Design of Experiments: General
E01 Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth; Environmental Accounts
E23 Macroeconomics: Production
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.