Replication data for: Communication, Renegotiation, and the Scope for Collusion

Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) David J. Cooper; Kai-Uwe Kühn

Name	File Type	Size	Last Modified
data			10/26/2021 09:00:AM
LICENSE.txt	text/plain	14.6 KB	10/12/2019 07:42:PM

Project Citation:

Cooper, David J., and Kühn, Kai-Uwe. Replication data for: Communication, Renegotiation, and the Scope for Collusion. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2014. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E114417V1

Project Description

Summary: We study the effect of communication in an experimental game where cooperation is consistent with equilibrium play if players share an understanding that cheating will be punished. Consistent with communication acting as a coordinating device, credible preplay threats to punish cheating are the most effective message to facilitate collusion. Promises to collude also improve cooperation. Credible threats do not occur in a treatment with a limited message space that permits threats of punishment. Contrary to some theoretical predictions, renegotiation possibilities facilitate collusion.

Scope of Project

Subject Terms: collusion; renegotiation; communication; cooperation

JEL Classification:
      C71 Cooperative Games
      C73 Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games; Repeated Games
      D83 Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
      L12 Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies

Time Period(s): 10/1/2006 – 3/1/2007 (Fall 2006 & Spring 2007)

Universe: Experimental subjects were undergraduates students at CWRU.

Data Type(s): experimental data

Methodology

Data Source: Data from experimental sessions.

Related Publications

Download this project

Published Versions

V1 [2019-10-12]

Export Metadata

Dublin Core

DDI 2.5

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.