Name File Type Size Last Modified
  2011_0215_Programs-and-data 10/25/2021 02:08:PM
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 10/12/2019 05:58:PM

Project Citation: 

Barattieri, Alessandro, Basu, Susanto, and Gottschalk, Peter. Replication data for: Some Evidence on the Importance of Sticky Wages. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2014. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E114290V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary We present evidence on the frequency of nominal wage adjustment using SIPP data adjusted for measurement error. The SIPP is a representative sample of the US population. Our main results are: (i) The average quarterly probability of a nominal wage change is between 21.1 and 26.6 percent, depending on the assumptions used. (ii) Wage changes are much more likely when workers change jobs. (iii) The frequency of wage adjustment does not display significant seasonal patterns. (iv) The hazard of a nominal wage change first increases and then decreases, with a peak at 12 months.

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms Measurement Error
JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      E24 Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital; Aggregate Labor Productivity
      E32 Business Fluctuations; Cycles
      E52 Monetary Policy
      J31 Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage Unites States
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 1996 – 2000
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) survey data

Methodology

Data Source:  View help for Data Source SIPP
Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation Hourly workers,

Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.