Replication data for: The Returns to Medical School: Evidence from Admission Lotteries

Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Nadine Ketel; Edwin Leuven; Hessel Oosterbeek; Bas van der Klaauw

Version: View help for Version V1

Name	File Type	Size	Last Modified
DATA			10/12/2019 12:53:PM
LICENSE.txt	text/plain	14.6 KB	10/12/2019 08:53:AM

Project Citation:

Ketel, Nadine, Leuven, Edwin, Oosterbeek, Hessel, and van der Klaauw, Bas. Replication data for: The Returns to Medical School: Evidence from Admission Lotteries. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2016. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E113626V1

Project Description

Summary: We exploit admission lotteries to estimate the returns to medical school in the Netherlands. Using data from up to 22 years after the lottery, we find that in every single year after graduation doctors earn at least 20 percent more than people who end up in their next-best occupation. Twenty-two years after the lottery the earnings difference is almost 50 percent. Only a small fraction of this difference can be attributed to differences in working hours and human capital investments. The returns do not vary with gender or ability, and shift the entire earnings distribution. (JEL D44, I11, I26, J24, J31, J44)

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:
      D44 Auctions
      I11 Analysis of Health Care Markets
      I26 Returns to Education
      J24 Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
      J31 Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
      J44 Professional Labor Markets; Occupational Licensing

Related Publications

Download this project

Published Versions

V1 [2019-10-12]

Export Metadata

Dublin Core

DDI 2.5

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.