Name File Type Size Last Modified
AER_20090648-ztt-files.zip application/zip 58.2 KB 10/11/2019 11:41:AM
AER_20090648_raw_data-do-file.zip application/zip 171.5 KB 10/11/2019 11:41:AM
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 10/11/2019 11:41:AM
readme.txt text/plain 4.8 KB 10/11/2019 11:41:AM

Project Citation: 

Dulleck, Uwe, Kerschbamer, Rudolf, and Sutter, Matthias. Replication data for: The Economics of Credence Goods: An Experiment on the Role of Liability, Verifiability, Reputation, and Competition. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2011. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-11. https://doi.org/10.3886/E112407V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Credence goods markets are characterized by asymmetric information between sellers and consumers that may give rise to inefficiencies, such as under- and overtreatment or market breakdown. We study in a large experiment with 936 participants the determinants for efficiency in credence goods markets. While theory predicts that liability or verifiability yield efficiency, we find that liability has a crucial, but verifiability at best a minor, effect. Allowing sellers to build up reputation has little influence, as predicted. Seller competition drives down prices and yields maximal trade, but does not lead to higher efficiency as long as liability is violated. (JEL D12, D82)

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms experiment; Credence goods
JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      D12 Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
      D82 Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage Austria
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 2005 – 2009
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) experimental data

Methodology

Data Source:  View help for Data Source Experimental lab data
Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation Experimental participants,

Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.