Name File Type Size Last Modified
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 10/11/2019 10:32:AM
ReadMeFile.AER.doc application/msword 33.5 KB 10/11/2019 10:32:AM
analysisFINALPublic.do text/plain 87.6 KB 10/11/2019 10:32:AM
biotech_allcontrols_FINALPublic.dta application/octet-stream 744.6 KB 10/11/2019 10:32:AM

Project Citation: 

Lerner, Josh, and Malmendier, Ulrike. Replication data for: Contractibility and the Design of Research Agreements. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2010. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-11. https://doi.org/10.3886/E112325V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary We analyze how contractibility affects contract design. A major concern when designing research agreements is that researchers use their funding to subsidize other projects. We show that, when research activities are not contractible, an option contract is optimal. The financing firm obtains the option to terminate the agreement and, in case of termination, broad property rights. The threat of termination deters researchers from cross-subsidization, and the cost of exercising the termination option deters the financing firm from opportunistic termination. We test this prediction using 580 biotechnology research agreements. Contracts with termination options are more common when research is non-contractible. (JEL D86, L65, O31, O34)

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      D86 Economics of Contract: Theory
      L65 Chemicals; Rubber; Drugs; Biotechnology; Plastics
      O31 Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
      O34 Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.