Ideological Polarization and Retrospective Economic Voting
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Michael Hall, Wichita State University
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
application/x-stata | 9.5 MB | 11/02/2018 08:15:AM |
|
text/html | 2.3 MB | 11/02/2018 08:17:AM |
Project Citation:
Hall, Michael. Ideological Polarization and Retrospective Economic Voting. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2018-11-02. https://doi.org/10.3886/E107143V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Economic voting, in which voters reward or punish incumbents
for the state of macroeconomic conditions, varies in its impact on U.S.
presidential elections over time. This
paper argues the degree of ideological polarization between the dominant
parties conditions the impact of economic voting. Economic voting is more common when
polarization is low, as more of the electorate are swing voters at the median
for whom macroeconomic conditions are a key determinant of voting. As polarization increases, more partisan and
ideological voters turn out to vote, and a larger share of voters choose
candidates on partisan and ideological grounds.
As polarization increases more of the electorate has perceptions of
economic performance based on partisan perceptions. Tests on these hypotheses use data from the
American National Election Study for the past eleven elections.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
polarization
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
USA
Time Period(s):
View help for Time Period(s)
1972 – 2012
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
survey data
Collection Notes:
View help for Collection Notes
The data are drawn from the American National Election Study (ANES). The data come from their cumulative file.
The data are drawn from the American National Election Study (ANES). The data come from their cumulative file.
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.