Anti-smoking social norms are associated with increased cessation behaviours among lower and higher socioeconomic status smokers: a population-based cohort study
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Sarah Durkin, Cancer Council Victoria
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
application/pdf | 297.1 KB | 10/29/2018 04:18:PM |
|
application/x-stata | 179.9 KB | 10/29/2018 04:17:PM |
|
text/x-stata-syntax | 41.4 KB | 10/30/2018 12:41:AM |
Project Citation:
Durkin, Sarah. Anti-smoking social norms are associated with increased cessation behaviours among lower and higher socioeconomic status smokers: a population-based cohort study. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2018-10-30. https://doi.org/10.3886/E107044V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
The
aims of this study were to describe the prevalence of adult smokers’
smoking-related perceptions of disapproval from family and friends, feelings of
embarrassment and close others’ quitting activity overall and across socioeconomic
status (SES) subgroups, to examine associations of these social norms with
quitting self-efficacy, urgency, intentions and behaviours, and to determine if
these associations differed by SES.
Data were from the Victorian Tracking Survey (VTS), which is a continuous cross-sectional telephone survey of Victorian adults aged 18-59 years who were smokers (currently smoked daily or weekly, or smoked monthly or less-than-monthly but self-identified as a smoker) or recent quitters (quit in the last year). The VTS monitors recall of state-funded anti-tobacco mass media campaigns and smoking-related cognitions and behaviours.
Participants were recruited for the baseline interview using a dual-frame probability sampling design, with half of all participants approached via landline and half via mobile phone random digit dialling. Telephone interviews were conducted in English, and only participants who reported watching any free-to-air commercial television on an average weekday were eligible to participate. The mean monthly baseline response rate, adjusted for those who declined to be formally screened but may have been in-scope for the interview, was 42%.
For the first three years of this survey (January 2012 to November 2014) participants were contacted for participation in a follow-up interview approximately one week after the baseline interview, only if during their baseline interview they recalled one of the state-funded advertisements that had been broadcast. Of 2,363 baseline smokers who were eligible for follow-up (i.e. recalled an advertisement and were not a recent quitter), 1,434 were successfully re-interviewed (61%) (n(weighted) = 1,459). A total of 1,348 participants had complete data on all predictors, outcomes and covariates of interest for the current study and were included in this dataset (n(weighted) = 1,373).
For analyses, data were weighted to account for telephony status (landline or mobile phone), sex and age, according to estimates of these distributions from a representative sample of smokers and recent quitters collected in the Victorian Smoking and Health Survey in November/early December each year [1].
Data were from the Victorian Tracking Survey (VTS), which is a continuous cross-sectional telephone survey of Victorian adults aged 18-59 years who were smokers (currently smoked daily or weekly, or smoked monthly or less-than-monthly but self-identified as a smoker) or recent quitters (quit in the last year). The VTS monitors recall of state-funded anti-tobacco mass media campaigns and smoking-related cognitions and behaviours.
Participants were recruited for the baseline interview using a dual-frame probability sampling design, with half of all participants approached via landline and half via mobile phone random digit dialling. Telephone interviews were conducted in English, and only participants who reported watching any free-to-air commercial television on an average weekday were eligible to participate. The mean monthly baseline response rate, adjusted for those who declined to be formally screened but may have been in-scope for the interview, was 42%.
For the first three years of this survey (January 2012 to November 2014) participants were contacted for participation in a follow-up interview approximately one week after the baseline interview, only if during their baseline interview they recalled one of the state-funded advertisements that had been broadcast. Of 2,363 baseline smokers who were eligible for follow-up (i.e. recalled an advertisement and were not a recent quitter), 1,434 were successfully re-interviewed (61%) (n(weighted) = 1,459). A total of 1,348 participants had complete data on all predictors, outcomes and covariates of interest for the current study and were included in this dataset (n(weighted) = 1,373).
For analyses, data were weighted to account for telephony status (landline or mobile phone), sex and age, according to estimates of these distributions from a representative sample of smokers and recent quitters collected in the Victorian Smoking and Health Survey in November/early December each year [1].
[1] Hayes L, Durkin S, Bain E, Wakefield M.
Smoking prevalence and consumption in Victoria: key findings from the Victorian
Smoking and Health population surveys. CBRC Research Paper Series No.47.
Melbourne, Australia: Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council
of Victoria, Prepared for: Quit Victoria; 2016 December.
Funding Sources:
View help for Funding Sources
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (1016419)
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.