A newer version of this project is available. See below for other available versions.
Development of the FLO Video-Coding Tool to Evaluate Responsive Caregiver-Child Interactions, Oregon, 2022-2024
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Andrea Imhof, University of Oregon, Prevention Science Institute
Version: View help for Version V1
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
application/xml | 50.9 KB | 06/03/2025 01:32:PM |
|
|
application/xml | 80 KB | 05/16/2025 08:26:AM |
|
|
application/xml | 74.5 KB | 05/16/2025 08:27:AM |
|
|
application/xml | 61.3 KB | 05/16/2025 08:27:AM |
|
|
application/xml | 80.3 KB | 05/16/2025 08:27:AM |
|
|
application/pdf | 27 KB | 05/16/2025 08:27:AM |
|
|
application/pdf | 70.7 KB | 05/16/2025 08:26:AM |
|
|
video/quicktime | 543.3 MB | 07/07/2025 11:01:AM |
|
|
video/quicktime | 545.1 MB | 05/16/2025 08:55:AM |
|
|
video/quicktime | 285.1 MB | 05/16/2025 08:55:AM |
- Total of 13 records. Records per page
- « previous Page of 2
- next »
Project Citation:
Project Description
Scope of Project
The development of the FLO Coding Tool involved the creation of a flowchart and an accompanying detailed glossary of terms that outlines the specific FLO coding rules. The initial measure was developed by a team of trained video-coders who worked closely together to make collaborative decisions about the final coding materials. This team also created five consensus-coded Gold Standard Videos to be used as training materials for new coders. Inter-rater reliability was established after the FLO development team successfully trained several teams of naive coders using these Gold Standard Videos; they were able to achieve consistently high levels of inter-rater reliability following coder training. These trained coding teams then coded three archival datasets designed to test the feasibility and validity of the tool across contexts. Data from these three archival datasets were used to establish the validity of the tool, describe its relationship to other relevant caregiver and child outcomes, and evaluate the tool's sensitivity to change over time.
Inclusion Criteria:
- This study did not collect new data but used existing archival videos from three different (existing) intervention projects.
Related Publications
Published Versions
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as received from the data depositor. As of April 2026, depositors are required to submit study materials in accessible formats. ICPSR has not reviewed, checked, or processed this material. For additional information about the study, please contact the investigator(s) directly. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR's Accessibility Center.