Name File Type Size Last Modified
Appendix_Final.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 27.3 KB 05/23/2025 11:55:AM

Project Citation: 

Duncheon, Julia. When College and High School Collide in the Anti-CRT Era: Exploring the Potential for Racial Truth-Telling in Dual Enrollment. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2025-05-23. https://doi.org/10.3886/E230961V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary K-12 teachers have become targets of political censorship in many states, with anti-CRT laws designed to eliminate racial truth-telling, or curricular content related to race and racism. Higher education has been targeted as well, most recently with anti-DEI initiatives, but college professors generally retain more curricular autonomy than their high school counterparts. As such, dual enrollment (DE)--college coursework delivered to high school students through a partnering postsecondary institution--may provide an avenue for students to learn about race and racism. Through the lens of racialized organizations, this study uses case study methodology to explore how a community college in Texas constrains or enables racial truth-telling in its DE courses. The findings show how the college's ostensibly race-neutral response to K-12 curricular censorship placed the burden to defend racial truth-telling on individual DE faculty, with implications for their ability to do it. The paper closes with recommendations for policy and practice. 
Funding Sources:  View help for Funding Sources Spencer Foundation (202000144)

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms dual enrollment; racialized organizations
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage Texas
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 2021 – 2024
Collection Date(s):  View help for Collection Date(s) 2021 – 2024
Universe:  View help for Universe Community college faculty and administrators
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) observational data; other

Methodology

Sampling:  View help for Sampling Focal sample of 12 faculty and 6 administrators out of larger sample of 42 faculty and 11 staff (N=53)
Data Source:  View help for Data Source One community college district in Texas
Collection Mode(s):  View help for Collection Mode(s) coded on-site observation; face-to-face interview; other

Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.