Name File Type Size Last Modified
Codebook.pdf application/pdf 388.1 KB 05/27/2025 05:59:AM
Dataset.csv text/csv 12.5 KB 05/27/2025 07:02:AM
Dataset.sas7bdat application/x-sas-data 128 KB 05/27/2025 05:59:AM
Formats.sas application/x-sas 10.7 KB 05/27/2025 09:03:AM
SAS import instructions.txt text/plain 401 bytes 05/27/2025 09:00:AM

Project Citation: 

Carroll-Scott, Amy, Diez Roux, Ana, and Eberth, Jan. ComPASS Coordinating Center Year 1 Consortium Survey. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2025-05-30. https://doi.org/10.3886/E228143V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary The ComPASS Consortium Survey was completed as part of the larger "Advancing Health Equity Through Innovative Community Capacity Building, Data Science & Delivering Community-Centered Structural Interventions & Outcomes: Drexel's ComPASS Coordination Center (C3)" cooperative agreement. This funding tasked C3 with providing oversight for the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the Community Partnerships to Advance Science for Society (ComPASS) Program, a first-of-its-kind national effort to advance community-led health equity structural intervention research. Acting as its backbone, the C3 administered and coordinated multiple components of the ComPASS Program through its three interdependent cores (Administrative, Data, and Capacity-Building), and coordinating the work of 24 community-led health equity structural intervention (CHESI) teams located throughout the United States. The ComPASS Consortium Survey aimed to assess the effectiveness of ComPASS organization and governance structure, activities, collaboration, communications, achievement of outcomes, and connections between consortium members and organizations as a growing network. As part of this survey, C3 solicited feedback from all members of the ComPASS consortium (e.g., NIH, C3, CHESIs, and 5 Hubs) to learn from this experience and shape future ComPASS activities to effectively build collaborations and achieve ComPASS goals. ComPASS was terminated on April 7, 2025 before the second annual survey.
Funding Sources:  View help for Funding Sources National Institute of Nursing Research (5U24NR021014-02); National Institute of Nursing Research (1U24NR021014-01)

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms program evaluation; social networks; community participation
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 9/2023 – 8/2024
Collection Date(s):  View help for Collection Date(s) 10/2024 – 2/2025
Universe:  View help for Universe All members of the ComPASS Consortium
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) survey data

Methodology

Response Rate:  View help for Response Rate
Of the 482 people contacted, 358 were eligible but did not respond, and 124 responded (118 complete, 6 partials). The response rate, using the RR2 definition from the American Association for Public Opinion Research, was 34.6%

The communication about the survey focused on representation at the organization level, which may have suppressed response rates. 

American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2016). Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. https://aapor.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf
Sampling:  View help for Sampling all individuals working on ComPASS at or with the Community Health Equity Structural Intervention (CHESI) partners, the ComPASS Coordinating Center (C3), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in October of 2024.
Data Source:  View help for Data Source ComPASS administrative records
Collection Mode(s):  View help for Collection Mode(s) web-based survey
Scales:  View help for Scales
Several Likert-type scales were used.

No common scales were used, however, questions were derived from other sources. Sources for each question are listed in the codebook
Weights:  View help for Weights N/A
Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation Individuals, organization
Geographic Unit:  View help for Geographic Unit N/A

Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.