The effects of virtual reality and augmented reality technologies on students' story retelling performance
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Betul Koparan
Version: View help for Version V1
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
application/x-spss-sav | 4.9 KB | 04/02/2025 01:04:PM |
Project Citation:
Koparan, Betul. The effects of virtual reality and augmented reality technologies on students’ story retelling performance. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2025-04-02. https://doi.org/10.3886/E225281V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
This study aims to compare the retelling performance of two
groups that engaged in reading activities with virtual reality and augmented
reality texts. Furthermore, the results of the interventions using these
technologies were compared with the results of the printed text reading
activity. The study participants comprised 100 students aged 12 to 13 years
studying in a secondary school. The researchers evaluated the students'
story-retelling performance through a rubric in the study. In the pre-test
stage, the students performed a paper-based reading activity on the texts in
the coursebook and their retelling performance was evaluated. In the post-test
stage, the reading activities of the two groups were carried out with the
intervention of virtual reality and augmented reality. While the pre-test
results showed no significant difference between the groups, the post-test
results indicated that the augmented reality intervention better supported the
students' retelling performance than virtual reality. However, there was no
significant difference between the two groups in the sub-categories of setting
and characters. Additionally, the virtual reality intervention did not create a
significant difference in the sub-categories of characters, event/plot,
problem, solution, and total score compared to the printed text reading
activity. However, it produced better results in the setting sub-category than
the printed text. A positive difference was observed in all sub-categories when
the augmented reality intervention was compared to the printed text reading
activity. AR showed greater benefits for retelling performance in this study,
but further research is needed on long-term retention.
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.