Latent School-Level Classes of Teacher Working Conditions in Virginia
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Luke C. Miller, University of Virginia
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
application/pdf | 936.8 KB | 10/20/2020 11:37:AM |
|
application/pdf | 513 KB | 12/06/2018 07:10:AM |
|
text/plain | 6.6 KB | 10/13/2021 04:46:AM |
|
text/plain | 2 KB | 01/24/2025 08:07:AM |
|
text/plain | 8.9 KB | 05/04/2023 10:54:AM |
|
text/plain | 3.5 KB | 06/29/2023 07:32:AM |
|
text/plain | 27.2 KB | 01/21/2025 02:13:PM |
|
text/plain | 6.6 KB | 08/13/2024 09:44:AM |
|
text/plain | 838 bytes | 02/17/2023 11:48:AM |
|
text/plain | 883 bytes | 10/12/2021 07:56:AM |
- Total of 98 records. Records per page
- « previous Page of 10
- next »
Project Citation:
Miller, Luke C. Latent School-Level Classes of Teacher Working Conditions in Virginia. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2025-01-24. https://doi.org/10.3886/E216502V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Many dimensions of teacher working conditions influence both teacher and student outcomes; yet, analyses of schools’ overall working conditions are challenged by high correlations among the dimensions. Our study overcame this challenge by applying latent profile analysis to school-level measures of school leadership, instructional agency, professional growth opportunities, rigorous instruction, managing student behavior, family engagement, physical environment, and safety. We identified four classes of schools: Supportive (61%), Unsupportive (7%), Unstructured (22%), and Structured (11%). The patterns of these classes suggest schools may face tradeoffs between factors such as more teacher autonomy for less instructional rigor or discipline. Teacher satisfaction and their stated career intentions were predicted by their school’s working conditions class, and school contextual factors predicted class membership. By identifying formerly unseen profiles of school-level teacher working conditions and considering the implications of being a teacher in each, decisionmakers can provide schools with targeted supports and investments.
Funding Sources:
View help for Funding Sources
United States Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences (R305A200106)
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
working conditions;
latent profile analysis;
teachers;
school improvement
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
Virginia
Time Period(s):
View help for Time Period(s)
9/1/2019 – 5/1/2021
Collection Date(s):
View help for Collection Date(s)
1/1/2021 – 5/1/2021
Universe:
View help for Universe
Public schools in Virginia during SY 2020-21
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
aggregate data
Methodology
Sampling:
View help for Sampling
All regular public schools opened in Virginia in Fall 2020 were sampled.
Data Source:
View help for Data Source
various public sources include Virginia Department of Education, Virginia Department of Health, U.S. Census Bureau, and National Center for Education Statistics
Unit(s) of Observation:
View help for Unit(s) of Observation
public school
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.