Anti-racist Research Practice-Partnerships in Education
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Camille Wilson, University of Michigan; Carolyn Hetrick, Independent Researcher; Richard Smith, Wayne State University; Jasahn Larsosa, Community Researcher
Version: View help for Version V1
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document | 42.7 KB | 12/23/2024 09:55:PM |
|
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document | 24.3 KB | 12/23/2024 09:55:PM |
Project Citation:
Wilson, Camille , Hetrick, Carolyn , Smith, Richard, and Larsosa, Jasahn . Anti-racist Research Practice-Partnerships in Education. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2024-12-24. https://doi.org/10.3886/E214081V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
These materials stem from an anti-racist RPP called
the Justice Now[1]
alliance aimed at dismantling the STPP. Our research collaborative was a
networked, intergenerational and community-engaged RPP that united researchers
from two Midwestern research universities, a partnering civil rights
organization, and community resident advisors to coordinate the RPP. In turn,
our partnership worked to convene and support four predominantly African
American, community-based action research teams composed of additional
university, youth, and community practitioner researchers who were also
interested in combating the STPP. Through
analysis of our qualitative study of the RPP’s first year, we
describe our prefiguring and implementation process and pinpoint how it yielded
opportunities, challenges, tensions, and benefits in advancing anti-racist
action research.
We aimed to “offer a context-rich, data-based narrative” that relied on a systematic self-study approach. Much of our qualitative data sources include records and notes involving many other people (including youth researchers), organizations, and interactions relevant to our community-engaged research work. As such, even with heavy redaction, it would be impossible to adequately de-identify these data sources. In line with our professional obligations, we will not share data that makes it possible to identify specific individuals beyond members of the authorship team.
We are able to share key, process-oriented data and analysis documents regarding our research practice-partnership planning and “prefiguration.” These documents can help other researchers conduct anti-racist research practice-partnership work in their own contexts/communities, including:
We aimed to “offer a context-rich, data-based narrative” that relied on a systematic self-study approach. Much of our qualitative data sources include records and notes involving many other people (including youth researchers), organizations, and interactions relevant to our community-engaged research work. As such, even with heavy redaction, it would be impossible to adequately de-identify these data sources. In line with our professional obligations, we will not share data that makes it possible to identify specific individuals beyond members of the authorship team.
We are able to share key, process-oriented data and analysis documents regarding our research practice-partnership planning and “prefiguration.” These documents can help other researchers conduct anti-racist research practice-partnership work in their own contexts/communities, including:
- Artifacts, including our RPP request for proposal and scoring rubric, which we discussed extensively in our manuscript.
[1]
All proper names are pseudonyms.
Funding Sources:
View help for Funding Sources
Spencer Foundation (202000153)
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
anti-racist;
education reform;
community organizations;
youths at risk;
qualitative research;
partnerships
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
Midwestern U.S.A.
Time Period(s):
View help for Time Period(s)
1/1/2021 – 12/31/2022
Collection Date(s):
View help for Collection Date(s)
7/1/2020 – 1/1/2022
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
administrative records data;
other
Collection Notes:
View help for Collection Notes
Research Practice-Partnership (RPP) request for proposal and RPP application scoring rubric
Methodology
Collection Mode(s):
View help for Collection Mode(s)
coded on-site observation;
other
Unit(s) of Observation:
View help for Unit(s) of Observation
group reflective study
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.