Name File Type Size Last Modified
  Code 09/11/2024 12:52:AM
  Data 09/11/2024 12:52:AM
  Figures 09/11/2024 12:51:AM
  Software 09/11/2024 12:52:AM
README.pdf application/pdf 106.3 KB 09/10/2024 08:51:PM

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary We provide evidence that classic lottery anomalies like probability weighting and loss aversion  are not special phenomena of risk.    They also arise (and often with equal strength) when subjects evaluate deterministic, positive monetary payments that have been disaggregated to resemble lotteries.   Thus, we find, e.g., apparent probability weighting in settings without probabilities and loss aversion in settings without scope for loss.  Across subjects, anomalies in these deterministic tasks strongly predicts the same anomalies in lotteries.  These findings suggest that much of the behavior motivating our most important behavioral theories of risk derive from complexity-driven mistakes rather than true risk preferences.

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms Complexity; fourfold pattern; loss aversion; probability weighting; prospect theory; risk; bounded rationality; economics experiments
JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      C91 Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
      D91 Micro-Based Behavioral Economics: Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage United States
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) experimental data


Related Publications

This study is un-published. See below for other available versions.

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.