The intersection of disability status and rurality in American Indian/Alaskan Native communities
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Lillie Greiman, Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities at the University of Montana; Catherine Ipsen, Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities at the University of Montana
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
0 |
Project Citation:
Greiman, Lillie , and Ipsen, Catherine . The intersection of disability status and rurality in American Indian/Alaskan Native communities. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2024-07-18. https://doi.org/10.3886/E208022V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
There
is a noteworthy gap in the literature regarding disability in rural
American
Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) communities. This is significant, as many tribal
lands are in rural areas and AI/AN individuals experience some of the highest
prevalence rates of disability. To address this gap, we used descriptive statistics
to examine the intersection of AI/AN and rurality in disability prevalence.
Results indicate that rural counties have the highest prevalence of disability
for both Whites and AI/ANs and that AI/ANs experience higher prevalence
rates than Whites. However, further analysis indicates that county makeup
(counties with high prevalence of AI/AN in the general population) moderated
this relationship. Specifically, rural counties with populations of at least 5%
AI/AN had lower prevalence of AI/AN disability compared to counties with
populations with less than 5% AI/AN. Further analysis is needed to unpack
this relationship, but results might suggest that AI/AN communities may
feature resilient and protective attributes, moderating the amount of disability
experienced in rural AI/AN communities.
Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) communities. This is significant, as many tribal
lands are in rural areas and AI/AN individuals experience some of the highest
prevalence rates of disability. To address this gap, we used descriptive statistics
to examine the intersection of AI/AN and rurality in disability prevalence.
Results indicate that rural counties have the highest prevalence of disability
for both Whites and AI/ANs and that AI/ANs experience higher prevalence
rates than Whites. However, further analysis indicates that county makeup
(counties with high prevalence of AI/AN in the general population) moderated
this relationship. Specifically, rural counties with populations of at least 5%
AI/AN had lower prevalence of AI/AN disability compared to counties with
populations with less than 5% AI/AN. Further analysis is needed to unpack
this relationship, but results might suggest that AI/AN communities may
feature resilient and protective attributes, moderating the amount of disability
experienced in rural AI/AN communities.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
Disability status;
rurality;
disabled;
American Indian;
Alaskan Native communities
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
Counties in the United States
Universe:
View help for Universe
Counties
in the United States
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
administrative records data
Collection Notes:
View help for Collection Notes
Data types-
The
American Community Survey 2015-2019 & OMB Metropolitan Classifications
2017
Methodology
Sampling:
View help for Sampling
3,136
Counties for descriptive and statistical analysis (pearsons r correlations
and t-tests)
Data Source:
View help for Data Source
The
American Community Survey 2015-2019
Collection Mode(s):
View help for Collection Mode(s)
other
Scales:
View help for Scales
Attached
with submission.
Unit(s) of Observation:
View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Counties
Geographic Unit:
View help for Geographic Unit
United States
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.