The intersection of disability status and rurality in American Indian/Alaskan Native communities

Principal Investigator(s):  View help for Principal Investigator(s) Lillie Greiman, Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities at the University of Montana; Catherine Ipsen, Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities at the University of Montana

Version:  View help for Version V1

Name File Type Size Last Modified
The intersection of disability status and rurality in American Indian Alaskan Native communities_Paper.pdf application/pdf 2 MB 07/18/2024 09:37:AM
The intersection of disability status and rurality in American Indian Alaskan Native communities_Summary and Secondary Data Sets.xlsx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet 16.5 KB 07/18/2024 09:40:AM
The intersection of disability status and rurality in American Indian Alaskan Native communities_paper data.xlsx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet 1.6 MB 07/18/2024 09:20:AM

Project Citation: 

Greiman, Lillie , and Ipsen, Catherine . The intersection of disability status and rurality in American Indian/Alaskan Native communities. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2024-07-18. https://doi.org/10.3886/E208022V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary There is a noteworthy gap in the literature regarding disability in rural American
Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) communities. This is significant, as many tribal
lands are in rural areas and AI/AN individuals experience some of the highest
prevalence rates of disability. To address this gap, we used descriptive statistics
to examine the intersection of AI/AN and rurality in disability prevalence.
Results indicate that rural counties have the highest prevalence of disability
for both Whites and AI/ANs and that AI/ANs experience higher prevalence
rates than Whites. However, further analysis indicates that county makeup
(counties with high prevalence of AI/AN in the general population) moderated
this relationship. Specifically, rural counties with populations of at least 5%
AI/AN had lower prevalence of AI/AN disability compared to counties with
populations with less than 5% AI/AN. Further analysis is needed to unpack
this relationship, but results might suggest that AI/AN communities may
feature resilient and protective attributes, moderating the amount of disability
experienced in rural AI/AN communities.
Funding Sources:  View help for Funding Sources NIDILRR (90RTCP0002)

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms Disability status; rurality; disabled; American Indian; Alaskan Native communities
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage Counties in the United States
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 1/1/2021 – 6/1/2022 (January 2021 - June 2022)
Collection Date(s):  View help for Collection Date(s) 1/1/2015 – 1/1/2019 (The American Community Survey 2015-2019)
Universe:  View help for Universe Counties in the United States
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) administrative records data
Collection Notes:  View help for Collection Notes
Data types- 
The American Community Survey 2015-2019 & OMB Metropolitan Classifications 2017

Methodology

Sampling:  View help for Sampling 3,136 Counties for descriptive and statistical analysis (pearsons r correlations and t-tests)
Data Source:  View help for Data Source The American Community Survey 2015-2019
Collection Mode(s):  View help for Collection Mode(s) other
Scales:  View help for Scales Attached with submission.
Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation Counties
Geographic Unit:  View help for Geographic Unit United States

Related Publications

Download this project

Published Versions

V1 [2024-07-18]

Export Metadata

Dublin Core

DDI 2.5

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.