Replication files for "Evaluating the Impact of the Fourth Round of China’s Poverty Alleviation Program"
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Kaixing Huang, Peking University; Yaxuan You, Peking University
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
data_code | 07/14/2024 07:53:AM |
Project Citation:
Huang, Kaixing, and You, Yaxuan. Replication files for “Evaluating the Impact of the Fourth Round of China’s Poverty Alleviation Program.” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2024-07-14. https://doi.org/10.3886/E207942V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
This study evaluates the impact of China's fourth round of the poverty alleviation program, which targeted 14 contiguous destitute areas containing 680 counties and a population of 240 million. From 2012 to 2019, China allocated a total of 813.6 billion yuan (US\$126.1 billion), primarily to economic development programs within these 14 areas. Using county-level data from 2006 to 2019, our difference-in-differences and difference-in-discontinuities estimates suggest that the program increased GDP per capita in the 14 areas by over 45\% from 2012 to 2019, with substantial gains observed in both the agricultural and non-agricultural sectors. Our preferred estimates suggest that the rate of return to the program ranged from 155.8\% to 165.8\%. Using data from over 14,500 rural households from 2006 to 2015, we find that the program significantly elevated rural income and reduced rural poverty. While the income growth of extremely poor households was driven more by agricultural income growth, the income growth of relatively poor households primarily resulted from non-agricultural sources.
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.