Name File Type Size Last Modified
  code 04/16/2024 05:55:PM
  disclosed 04/16/2024 05:55:PM
  results 04/16/2024 05:57:PM

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Abstract: Using LEHD data, we demonstrate several facts that are not consistent with the "spatial mismatch" hypothesis that residential segregation and uneven distribution of jobs limits Black workers’ opportunities. We show that (a) there is no Black-white gap in the firm premium component of wages in an Abowd-Kramarz-Margolis wage decomposition; (b) there are both more jobs and more good jobs within commuting distance of Black than white workers; and (c) Black workers’ commutes are shorter. We conclude that geographic proximity to good jobs is not a major source of racial earnings gaps in major U.S. cities today.

This replication archive contains all code for the project. It does not contain data, as all data are restricted-use data held by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms black-white earnings gap; spatial mismatch
JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      J15 Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination
      J31 Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
      J70 Labor Discrimination: General
      R23 Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics: Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population; Neighborhood Characteristics
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage United States
Universe:  View help for Universe
Non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black full-time wage and salary workers covered by unemployment insurance

Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) program source code


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.