Training young adults with intellectual/developmental disabilities and co-occurring mental health conditions to deliver a peer mentoring intervention
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Ariel Schwartz, University of New Hampshire
Version: View help for Version V1
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet | 12.7 KB | 03/21/2024 05:22:AM |
|
|
text/csv | 3.5 KB | 03/21/2024 08:52:AM |
|
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet | 269.6 KB | 03/21/2024 08:49:AM |
|
|
application/zip | 245.7 KB | 03/21/2024 05:03:AM |
|
|
application/pdf | 123.6 KB | 03/21/2024 05:21:AM |
Project Citation:
Project Description
This study builds upon a peer mentoring intervention that addresses identification and utilization of coping strategies to reduce challenging mental health symptoms for young adults with IDD-MH. In this peer mentoring intervention, a young adult with IDD-MH serves as the peer mentor. Feasibility testing of this intervention suggested that the intervention was feasible and had potential promise to improve young adults’ mental health. However, we observed that some content and skills were difficult for mentors to deliver with high levels of fidelity. Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to expand, refine, and adapt the previously developed peer mentoring training protocol and to evaluate its preliminary efficacy for supporting high-fidelity peer mentoring delivery.
In this study, we will collaborated with an advisory board composed of experts in peer-delivered mental health services to refine the existing training protocol, develop additional training activities, and adapt the protocol for virtual delivery. The new protocol targeted content and quality criteria implemented with <80% average fidelity across mentors and sessions in the preliminary study. Next, we evaluated the preliminary efficacy of the expanded, refined, and adapted peer mentoring training protocol on peer mentors’ ability to meet fidelity criteria. After receiving training, mentors delivered the 16-week peer mentoring intervention to 12 participants. We evaluated fidelity to content and quality criteria. Concurrently, we collected data about potential efficacy of the peer mentoring intervention on participants by gathering self-reported data about participants’ self-efficacy for managing emotions, mental health symptoms, and mood at three time points: pre-intervention (2-weeks prior), post-intervention (within 1 week of concluding the intervention), and follow-up (4-weeks post intervention).
Scope of Project
Methodology
Related Publications
Published Versions
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as received from the data depositor. As of April 2026, depositors are required to submit study materials in accessible formats. ICPSR has not reviewed, checked, or processed this material. For additional information about the study, please contact the investigator(s) directly. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR's Accessibility Center.