Data and Code for: The Shifting Reasons for Beveridge-Curve Shifts
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Gadi Barlevy, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago; R. Jason Faberman, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago; Bart Hobijn, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago; Aysegul Sahin, University of Texas-Austin
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
odg | 02/11/2024 06:29:PM | ||
02/11/2024 06:29:PM | |||
png | 02/11/2024 06:31:PM | ||
svg | 02/11/2024 06:31:PM |
Project Description
Abstract:
We discuss how the relative importance of factors that contribute to movements of the US Beveridge curve has changed from 1959 to 2023. We review these factors in the context of a simple flow analogy used to capture the main insights of search and matching theories of the labor market. Changes in inflow rates, related to demographics, accounted for Beveridge curve shifts between 1959 and 2000. A reduction in matching efficiency, that depressed unemployment outflows, shifted the curve outwards in the wake of the Great Recession. In contrast, the most recent shifts in the Beveridge curve appear driven by changes in the eagerness of workers to switch jobs. Finally, we argue that, while the Beveridge curve is a useful tool for relating unemployment and job openings to inflation, the link between these labor market indicators and inflation depends on whether and why the Beveridge curve shifted. Therefore, a careful examination of the factors underlying movements in the Beveridge curve is essential for drawing policy conclusions from the joint behavior of unemployment and job openings.
Scope of Project
E52 Monetary Policy
J20 Demand and Supply of Labor: General
J63 Labor Turnover; Vacancies; Layoffs
Methodology
Related Publications
Published Versions
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.