The Disparate Impact of Uncertainty Shocks on Labor Market Outcomes for Men and Women
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Todd B. Potts, Indiana University of Pennsylvania; Jennifer Roy, Waynesburg University
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
application/x-stata-dta | 636.9 KB | 09/15/2023 07:10:AM |
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document | 12.8 KB | 09/15/2023 07:37:AM |
Project Citation:
Potts, Todd B., and Roy, Jennifer. The Disparate Impact of Uncertainty Shocks on Labor Market Outcomes for Men and Women. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2023. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2023-09-15. https://doi.org/10.3886/E193822V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
This study examines whether innovations to macroeconomic uncertainty affect labor market outcomes for men and women differently. Three measures of uncertainty are utilized in turn within a vector autoregression (VAR) and the dynamic responses of various labor market ratios to uncertainty shocks are analyzed. These labor market ratios are the ratio of men’s to women’s median earnings, the ratio of men’s to women’s labor force participation, and the ratio of men’s to women’s unemployment. Findings reveal that increases in macroeconomic uncertainty lead to recessionary outcomes, with the unemployment rate for men rising higher than that for women. There is evidence that men’s labor force participation declines more than women’s during such shocks, but the ratio of real earnings is largely unchanged. When uncertainty is proxied by stock market volatility, most of the increase in men’s unemployment relative to women’s is due to uncertainty’s adverse impact on real GDP growth. When uncertainty is related to economic policy uncertainty, however, it is uncertainty itself that drives the higher relative unemployment rate for men. Halting the estimation at 2019Q4 and generating out of sample forecasts show that the COVID-19 recession reversed this trend, as women were more disproportionately affected than men.
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
A10 General Economics: General
A10 General Economics: General
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.