Name File Type Size Last Modified
  code 10/10/2023 10:12:AM
  data 04/10/2023 09:04:AM
  output 04/10/2023 09:04:AM
LICENSE.txt text/plain 16.7 KB 04/12/2023 07:24:AM
ReadMe.pdf application/pdf 257.1 KB 10/11/2023 07:30:AM

Project Citation: 

Cabral, Marika, and Dillender, Marcus. Data and Code for “Gender Differences in Medical Evaluations: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Doctors.” Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2024. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2024-01-29. https://doi.org/10.3886/E188361V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Little is known about what drives gender disparities in health care and related social insurance benefits. Using data and variation from the Texas workers’ compensation program, we study the impact of gender match between doctors and patients on medical evaluations and associated disability benefits. Compared to differences among their male patient counterparts, female patients randomly assigned a female doctor rather than a male doctor are 5.2% more likely to be evaluated as disabled and receive 8.6% more subsequent cash benefits on average. There is no analogous gender-match effect for male patients. Our estimates indicate that increasing the share of female patients evaluated by female doctors may substantially shrink gender gaps in medical evaluations and associated outcomes.
Funding Sources:  View help for Funding Sources National Science Foundation (CAREER Award 1845190); United States Social Security Administration (RDR18000003 through the Retirement and Disability Research Consortium)

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      I10 Health: General


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.