Name File Type Size Last Modified
  CIDFSubst 03/20/2023 01:23:PM
  CIDFont 03/20/2023 01:23:PM
  CMap 03/20/2023 01:28:PM
  ColorSpace 03/20/2023 01:28:PM
  Decoding 03/20/2023 01:29:PM
  Encoding 03/20/2023 01:29:PM
  Font 03/20/2023 01:30:PM
  IdiomSet 03/20/2023 01:30:PM
  Init 03/20/2023 01:31:PM
  SubstCID 03/20/2023 01:31:PM

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary
We analyze whether government spending multipliers differ by the sign of the shock. Using aggregate historical U.S. data, we apply Ben Zeev’s (2020) nonlinear diagnostic tests and find evidence of nonlinearities in the impulse response functions of both government spending and GDP. We then extend Ramey and Zubairy’s (2018) framework to allow for asymmetric effects as a type of state dependence to estimate multipliers. While we find differences in the impulse response functions, the resulting multipliers do not differ by sign of the shock. Thus, we find no evidence of asymmetry of government spending multipliers.

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      C32 Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models: Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes; State Space Models
      E62 Fiscal Policy
      N12 Economic History: Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics; Industrial Structure; Growth; Fluctuations: U.S.; Canada: 1913-
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage United States


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.