Was Marshall Right? Managerial Failure and Corporate Ownership in Edwardian Britain
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Michael Aldous, Queen's University Belfast; Philip Tadelle Fliers, Queen's University Belfast; John Turner, Queen's University Belfast
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
application/zip | 1.3 MB | 11/16/2022 06:26:AM |
Project Citation:
Project Description
Alfred Marshall argued that the malaise of public companies in Edwardian Britain was due to the separation of ownership from control and a lack of professional management. In this paper, we examine the ownership and control of the c.1,700 largest British companies in 1911. We find that most public companies had a separation of ownership and control, but that this had little effect on their performance. We also find that manager characteristics that proxy for amateurism are uncorrelated with performance. Ultimately, our evidence suggests that, if Marshall was correct in identifying a corporate malaise in Britain, its source lay elsewhere.
Scope of Project
Methodology
Bassett, Herbert H. Businessmen at Home and Abroad: A Biographical Directory of Partners, Principals, Directors, and Managers of Important Business Firms and Institutions at Home and Abroad, 1912-13. London: St Paul’s Chambers, 1912.
Dictionary of Business Biography.
Financial Times Historical Archive.
Investor’s Monthly Manual, Dec. 1910.
The Times Digital Archive.
The Investors’ Four Shilling Yearbook. 1912. London: Charles Letts and Co.
Related Publications
This study is un-published. See below for other available versions.
Published Versions
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.